Jump to content

Talk:Avocation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 68.74.73.84 - ""
Rallias (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
==Fictional people?==
==Fictional people?==
Is it really necessary to have a list of fictional people with avocations containing only Bruce Wayne? I'm deleting it because it only makes the rest of the article look silly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.74.73.84|68.74.73.84]] ([[User talk:68.74.73.84|talk]]) 01:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Is it really necessary to have a list of fictional people with avocations containing only Bruce Wayne? I'm deleting it because it only makes the rest of the article look silly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.74.73.84|68.74.73.84]] ([[User talk:68.74.73.84|talk]]) 01:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I agree. What is the justification of "Fictional People"? I mean, if there was more than 1 person for that list, I'd agree its a valid list, but... Just because its a "famous" fictional person, every other entry in the list is a real person past or present. Rallias Ubernerd 21:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:41, 9 August 2012

WikiProject iconSociology Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Point of having a picture of Bess Truman?

Why is there a picture of Bess Truman? I thought in order to have an avocation you first needed a job... ah... it is related to the volunteer scout leaders (I suppose). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.9.223 (talkcontribs) 14:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional people?

Is it really necessary to have a list of fictional people with avocations containing only Bruce Wayne? I'm deleting it because it only makes the rest of the article look silly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.74.73.84 (talk) 01:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. What is the justification of "Fictional People"? I mean, if there was more than 1 person for that list, I'd agree its a valid list, but... Just because its a "famous" fictional person, every other entry in the list is a real person past or present. Rallias Ubernerd 21:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)