Talk:Avocation: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 68.74.73.84 - "" |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Fictional people?== |
==Fictional people?== |
||
Is it really necessary to have a list of fictional people with avocations containing only Bruce Wayne? I'm deleting it because it only makes the rest of the article look silly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.74.73.84|68.74.73.84]] ([[User talk:68.74.73.84|talk]]) 01:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Is it really necessary to have a list of fictional people with avocations containing only Bruce Wayne? I'm deleting it because it only makes the rest of the article look silly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.74.73.84|68.74.73.84]] ([[User talk:68.74.73.84|talk]]) 01:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I agree. What is the justification of "Fictional People"? I mean, if there was more than 1 person for that list, I'd agree its a valid list, but... Just because its a "famous" fictional person, every other entry in the list is a real person past or present. Rallias Ubernerd 21:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:41, 9 August 2012
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | Sociology Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Point of having a picture of Bess Truman?
Why is there a picture of Bess Truman? I thought in order to have an avocation you first needed a job... ah... it is related to the volunteer scout leaders (I suppose). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.9.223 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Fictional people?
Is it really necessary to have a list of fictional people with avocations containing only Bruce Wayne? I'm deleting it because it only makes the rest of the article look silly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.74.73.84 (talk) 01:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. What is the justification of "Fictional People"? I mean, if there was more than 1 person for that list, I'd agree its a valid list, but... Just because its a "famous" fictional person, every other entry in the list is a real person past or present. Rallias Ubernerd 21:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)