Template:Did you know nominations/List of Kings XI Punjab cricketers

List of Kings XI Punjab cricketers

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Shaun Marsh (pictured) has scored the most runs for Kings XI Punjab?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kentrigg
• Comment: Moved from userspace.

Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 14:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

• ALT1: that Shaun Marsh (pictured) has scored the most runs for Kings XI Punjab?
• ALT2: that out of the 56 cricketers who have played for Kings XI Punjab, Shaun Marsh (pictured) has scored the most runs?

Seems fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Thine Antique Pen 14:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Players' photographs must be arranged so that it doesnt look like an empty article. Needs columns.Khyati Gupta (talk) 04:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

The first hook is not really visible in the text of the article. I read the source. It does indicate that he scored the most, but you have to explicitly state it in the article itself. Khyati Gupta (talk) 04:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Another additional formatting fixing needs to be done, the "Key" should be with the column of the scores list. Either move the scores at the top with the key and move the picture gallery at the bottom or do it the other way around. Khyati Gupta (talk) 04:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Also, the hook's link to the article needs to be relevant. Eg:

• ALT3: ... that Shaun Marsh (pictured) , one of the Kings XI Punjab cricketers, scored the most runs in IPL?

Khyati Gupta (talk) 04:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks! Thine Antique Pen 08:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Right, player's photos don't need to be in columns, see List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers for a current FL candidate which just passed DYK

Ref added.

I'm keeping it where it is, see List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers. Thine Antique Pen 08:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Before there was an empty space beside the pictures. Now its not there and the scores are aligned with the pictures. I was only suggesting columns. It looks way better now. Good work! Khyati Gupta (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, you might've needed to purge it! If you're reviewing this, could you? If not, someone else can. :) Thine Antique Pen 09:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

New enough and long enough at the time of nomination. Images have acceptable copyrights. Hook proposed is formatted properly, the article was created 14th August. So it is still brand new while nominated for DYK. The scores have been neutrally explained the the beginning. The scores were interpreted by looking at the raw scores themselves so it is free of copyright violations or plagiarism. Sources are cited properly. I read through the sources to see if they are valid and they do seem valid and free of any copying and pasting on wikipedia. Khyati Gupta (talk) 21:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)