Jump to content

Talk:John Constantine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Polotet (talk | contribs)
Link? -Mr. Tachyon
Line 1: Line 1:
{{comicsproj}}
{{comicsproj}}

I don't know about that link to the bisexual page...it doesn't really have much on it aside from the 'under construction' sign. Maybe we should put it back once the page is done, but until that time it doesn't really have much of anything to offer.


*What's your source for changing "cunt" to "cur", 66.19.136.106? I see the former on Google, but not the latter. (Just asking to make sure this isn't an attempt at censorship.) -[[User:Silence|Silence]] 00:43, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
*What's your source for changing "cunt" to "cur", 66.19.136.106? I see the former on Google, but not the latter. (Just asking to make sure this isn't an attempt at censorship.) -[[User:Silence|Silence]] 00:43, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:56, 2 May 2006

WikiProject iconComics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I don't know about that link to the bisexual page...it doesn't really have much on it aside from the 'under construction' sign. Maybe we should put it back once the page is done, but until that time it doesn't really have much of anything to offer.

superpowers?

under film adaptation, the article points to constantine having superpowers in the movie. this seems inaccurate as he only had a unique grasp of the spirit realm to achieve his goals.

  • It's a superpower. Unlike the comic-book version, his ability to see the strange and unusual isn't due to self-teaching and awareness of the supernatural, it's a power granted to him after he was revived, post-suicide attempt. --Mister Six 11:36, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't believe that's so; I watched the movie yesterday, watching it again today and Constantine insists he's been able to see what he sees since he was born. In fact his gift is the motivation for the suicide, not vice versa.Bombfish 01:15, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yes, you're right. But even then, it's as much a superpower as, say, the mutant powers that the X-Men have, or the abilities that Superman has. --Mister Six 12:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • What is with the tattoos that he has in the movie. What do they do? When tries to put his fore arms together? [User: Cal]

Bisexuality

Constantine is bisexual; restored LGBT category link. --Mister Six 22:02, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Should he really be counted as bisexual? He only did those gay acts because he was possessed. 199.79.168.160 07:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He was possessed on neither of the occasions that have featured in the series, and since he referred to himself having boyfriends in the past, one can assume he was not possessed then, either. But I suspect you knew that.--Just1Page 00:40, 06 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, he *was* possessed all of those times. It didn't say so in the original stories, but it's been retconned since then. Besides, Constantine is too much of a badass to like other guys, plus that would mean that despite all his efforts fighting demons he would still be going to hell. --199.79.168.160 09:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jesus Christ (pun intended)! Did you actually read Hellblazer? Do you have any idea what it's about? Please stop sabotaging this information service with your petty prejudices. Perceive 00:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fact is, if you have sex with someone of the same gender as you, it's a mortal sin. It's not prejudice, it's official church doctrine. --199.79.168.160 06:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're looking for Hellblazer's protagonist to conform to church doctrine? In fact, you insist he does contrary to what's in the books? I don't know if you're just a troll or a zealot of some kind, though the result seems to be the same. Further alterations will be considered vandalism and reported as such. Perceive 16:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Checking your history, you sure seem to care a lot about which comic book characters are considered gay. That makes you a very biased source. 199.79.168.160 23:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Checking your comments on this page, you seem to be a homophobe. That makes you a very biased source. (Whereas actually, having a lot of knowledge about a topic generally doesn't make you a biased source.)-Polotet 00:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a homophobe in any way, shape, or form; I simply aim for the truth. You can't treat homosexuality as if it's on par with heterosexuality. 199.79.168.160 02:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I can. And, in fact, I do.-Polotet 16:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But they're NOT on par, it's a scientific fact. 199.79.168.160 01:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Constantine would be the last man I'd expect to conform to what the church wants. He's not very interested in God, just keeping himself alive.--Toffile 00:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but he also has some sense of morality and honor. Just because he's willing to do somewhat unscrupulous things like causing people's deaths with his recklessness, doesn't mean he'd be so indecent as to have sex with another man. 199.79.168.160 02:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Morality is subjective. Do not interject your views on morality with another's. (Even if he's fictional)--Toffile 16:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And please do not tell me you just referenced yourself with this edit. [1]. Your IP belongs to Purchase.--Toffile 16:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did reference myself, am I not a valid source? And morality may be subjective, but some things are universal, I think no matter what religion or lack thereof a person believes in, civilized people can all agree that homosexuality is crossing the line. Constantine's killings, through action or inaction, may not be considered wrong from a certain point of view, but the same can't be said about his bisexuality. 199.79.168.160 01:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, you're not a reputable source. Also, you have the misapprehension that you have the only viewpoint that belongs in the article. That's not true.--Toffile 02:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, ok, I'm calling troll on this one.-Polotet 11:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not trying to troll this article. I don't think that only my viewpoint belongs in it, as Toffile claims, but I don't think that my viewpoint should be completely disregarded, either. As it stands now, you refuse to even entertain the possibility that some fans believe that Constantine isn't really bi, even if it's worded in a way that makes it clear that this is just an opinion which hasn't been proven (or disproven for that matter). I think that at least that concept should be mentioned in some way or another, if not in the way that I added it in, then perhaps in a new section about the controversey over Constantine's sexuality or something like that. As it stands now, what you're doing isn't NPOV, you're completely ignoring the opinions of one side of the debate. 199.79.168.160 11:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't imagine someone sincerely typing "civilized people can all agree that homosexuality is crossing the line," simply because I don't believe that you've never met anyone who wasn't a homophobe before. But just in case, hi, I like to think I'm a "civilized person" and while I'm not gay or bisexual myself, I feel that homosexuality and bisexuality are no different on a moral level from heterosexuality, and that a man having sex with a man is acting no more or less morally than a man having sex with a woman. And a large majority of the people I know agree with me. Beyond that, it is not POV to not include a claim some random person makes on the talk page in the article. If I randomly develop a theory that Superman is actually gay and his relationships with Lois Lane and other women have just been a coverup, I don't get to put it in the Superman article without any sourcing, or just sourcing myself. If it's really a significant opinion among Hellblazer fans, find a reliable source discussing it somewhere, and the we can talk.-Polotet 23:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When a valid source for such speculation can be found, feel free to include it. CovenantD 15:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relatives

I cut out a chunk of relatives. I'm sorry, but most of the people weren't relative. I kept most of the close relations, sans the demonspawn who were only in one arc. Nergal is not a relative. Yes, John knocked up his daughter, but that does not make him notable. There were others, but I may elminate Pyotr as well, since he was only in The Trench Coat Brigade. Joanna should stay, as she's been the focus of a miniseries, and appeared a few times in the Sandman.--Toffile 20:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Took out Pytor because he was even more obscure than some of the ones you cut out. Restored the kids because they were in two major arcs and two single issues, and Maria is still alive so she may return. --Mister Six 11:36, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Zippo Lighter !

The Zippo Lighter John Constantine uses is it the some one. In all the coimcs ?--Brown Shoes22 06:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • He had a recurring zippo lighter with a snake emblem in the Eddie Campbell books and at the start of the Paul Jenkins run, but he later gave it away to someone while in Abbadon. Since then, he's mostly used disposeable lighters. --82.27.204.166 12:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

appearances in other comics

I added a section for John's appearances in comics other than Hellblazer and The Swamp Thing, which wouldn't really fit in any existing sections, and wrote up some info on his Sandman appearance for it. It might be a bit excessive in terms of information for a one-issue appearance--if you think so, feel free to edit it down. I'll probably write up a bit on his role in The Books of Magic later.-Polotet 04:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]