Talk:Rose hip seed oil: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:02, 10 September 2012

Food and drink Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non established, non encyclopaedic info in last paragraph

The last paragraph contains such commercial, cosmetic-industry language as "promotes collagen and elastin production which smoothes the skin" etc. I marked them all as citation needed but am tempted to simply remove them. There are studies that do support what's written... poorly organized, methodologically problematic studies funded by cosmetic manufacturers. This article needs proper chemical info and a reference to the vast amount of studies on the in-vivo affect of Rose hip oil. John Holly (talk) 10:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and I deleted the lot. Until there is a valid, respectable study to cite, all of these claims are quackery which were no doubt added by parties with a vested interest in the product.

Revision as of 10:38, 18 May 2012 edit John1987 (talk \| contribs) 364 edits →‎Non established, non encyclopaedic info in last paragraph ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:02, 10 September 2012 edit undo Coolcato (talk \| contribs) 100 edits →‎Non established, non encyclopaedic info in last paragraph Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	The last paragraph contains such commercial, cosmetic-industry language as "promotes collagen and elastin production which smoothes the skin" etc. I marked them all as citation needed but am tempted to simply remove them. There are studies that do support what's written... poorly organized, methodologically problematic studies funded by cosmetic manufacturers. This article needs proper chemical info and a reference to the vast amount of studies on the in-vivo affect of Rose hip oil. [[User:John1987\|John Holly]] ([[User talk:John1987\|talk]]) 10:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)		The last paragraph contains such commercial, cosmetic-industry language as "promotes collagen and elastin production which smoothes the skin" etc. I marked them all as citation needed but am tempted to simply remove them. There are studies that do support what's written... poorly organized, methodologically problematic studies funded by cosmetic manufacturers. This article needs proper chemical info and a reference to the vast amount of studies on the in-vivo affect of Rose hip oil. [[User:John1987\|John Holly]] ([[User talk:John1987\|talk]]) 10:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
			::I agree and I deleted the lot. Until there is a valid, respectable study to cite, all of these claims are quackery which were no doubt added by parties with a vested interest in the product.