Jump to content

Talk:Clinton National Airport: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: Line 31:


A quick check of the LIT webpage flight tracker shows 50 arrivals and 50 departures on a weekday. [[User:Eric in SF|Eric in SF]] ([[User talk:Eric in SF|talk]]) 11:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
A quick check of the LIT webpage flight tracker shows 50 arrivals and 50 departures on a weekday. [[User:Eric in SF|Eric in SF]] ([[User talk:Eric in SF|talk]]) 11:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

== Incidents/Accidents? ==

Most airport articles have an incidents/accidents section. Is there any particular reason why this article doesn't have one, or is this just an oversight?

[[American Airlines Flight 1420|This article]]] would certainly be a good starting point for anyone who needs convincing that such a section would be an appropriate addition to the article. [[Special:Contributions/64.185.130.216|64.185.130.216]] ([[User talk:64.185.130.216|talk]]) 14:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:55, 11 September 2012

WikiProject iconAviation: Airports Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airport project.

Airline Operated Aircraft

Unless an objection is raised, I propose removing this section. It is inconsistent with other airport articles and has the potential to change even more than the destinations. I will give a few days for comments, and if nothing is said, I will remove it. NW036 13:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Well I guess for most airports it has the possibility to change. But LIT doesn't really change that much. I'd guess that information changes maybe once a month, if that much. (Jbrewste 15:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

  • I agree, as long as the airline list itself is not removed. The airline and routing list is very useful, I believe. "Antonio Sex and HIGHness Martin" 1:43, 1 November, 2008 (UTC)

FedEx

Wasn't FedEx originally based (or supposed to be based) at LIT? -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Service to Phoenix

How come if there is a flight to Phoenix on the page's map, there is no indication that such a flight exists on the airline and destination section?? Perhaps Southwest Airlines covers the route and no one listed Phoenix next to Southwest? Or USAirways? Or perhaps that line needs to be deleted from the route map on the article??

-- "Antonio Humping you Martin" 1:47, 1 November, 2008 (UTC)


Southwest doesn't have the non-stop to PHX anymore according to it's own routemap. The map needs to make several corrections....MSP and PHX have both been dropped. And MEM needs to be added.

No, the official website lists service to PHX.165.82.76.44 (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Service to Pittsburgh

However, there is definitely no service to Pittsburgh165.82.76.44 (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flight volume

Perhaps this section needs updating. As of August 2012, Southwest has only 12 daily flights serving this airport, and Delta (all services) has nine, according to gate agents at the airport (weekday services). I don't know what the numbers are for American Eagle. Given these numbers, 150 daily flights appears to be unrealistic. 40-60 might be more like it. There has been a trend of smaller market airports losing service...Raryel (talk) 06:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A quick check of the LIT webpage flight tracker shows 50 arrivals and 50 departures on a weekday. Eric in SF (talk) 11:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents/Accidents?

Most airport articles have an incidents/accidents section. Is there any particular reason why this article doesn't have one, or is this just an oversight?

This article] would certainly be a good starting point for anyone who needs convincing that such a section would be an appropriate addition to the article. 64.185.130.216 (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]