User talk:Jkelly: Difference between revisions
NikoSilver (talk | contribs) m →The [[FYROM]] blog (again): copy from my talk :-) |
Guy Peters (talk | contribs) == Last reply == |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
It's at 22:17 in the [http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=9883&showrashi=true link given in the article]. I could believe that different Bible translations give slightly different verse numberings, though. [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 22:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
It's at 22:17 in the [http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=9883&showrashi=true link given in the article]. I could believe that different Bible translations give slightly different verse numberings, though. [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 22:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
: Yeah, well, you know those English kings, can't turn your back on them.... :-) Cheers, [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 22:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
: Yeah, well, you know those English kings, can't turn your back on them.... :-) Cheers, [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 22:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Last reply == |
|||
In the series of my last contributions, I post my reply to your text on my user page. In case you wish to reply to me you are welcome to send me an e-mail of post a comment on [http://wikipedie.blogspot.com/ my blog]. |
|||
You may feel that I behave strangely. It is obvious since you don't know now more than one-and-half year struggle on cs: during which I was desysopped as a bureacrat. If you are interested in problems of small wikies, then you can read [[:m:Requests for comments/Cswiki issues]], [[:m:Meta:Babel#Czech Wikipedia in disarray]] and before it will deleted [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:V%C3%ADt_Zv%C3%A1novec/My_defence&oldid=204027] as well. |
|||
In my view conflicts with some cs: editors are unsolveable. They or me should leave cs:, there is no place for both the parties. These conflict was often transmissed to Meta and now to en:. This is unhappy because both Meta and en: has nothing to do with cs:. But I am sorry that both Meta editors and Board of Directors did nothing to improve the situation, they just washed their hands like [[Pontius Pilate]]. Their choice but I cannot participate at the project where my rights are overlooked. I am fully decided, it is not a question of one conflict here. |
|||
"You can still edit your User talk page even while blocked." ??? Is that technically possible? I never heard about it. |
|||
I hate translating, I find it very boring work. And my English is not perfect as well. |
|||
So I wish you good luck and thank you for your deleting of my pages. -- [[User:Vít Zvánovec|Vít Zvánovec]] 10:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:54, 4 May 2006
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
- Archive 1 (September 2 2005 to November 7 2005)
- Archive 2 (November 7 2005 to January 8 2006)
- Archive 3 (January 10 2006 to March 10 2006)
- Archive 4 (March 11 2006 to May 1 2006)
A landslide victory for The JPS (aka RFA thanks)
Hey, Jkelly, thank you so much for your vote and comments in my RfA, which passed with an overwhelming consensus of 95/2/2. I was very surprised and flattered that the community has entrusted me with these lovely new toys. I ripped open the box and started playing with them as soon as I got them, and I've already had the pleasure of deleting random nonsense/attacks/copyvios tonight. If I ever do anything wrong, or can help in some way, please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, and I will do my best to correct my mistake, or whatever... Now, to that bottle of wine waiting for me... |
![]() |
Unreasonable blocking by Jonathunder
Hi, I am sorry for bothering you, but can you please look here and comment on the matter? Thanks. FunkyFly 03:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
The FYROM blog (again)
Well, I agree with you, as I have already agreed in that page before, again and again and again... I think the problem lies in what people tend to define as article improvement. For me, for example, (as for many other users, not necessarily Greek, like here and here), the ultimate article improvement for this particular article, would be to have a fairly elaborate analysis of the naming dispute. Hence, the name of the article itself, is a huge article improvement issue. The funny comments about your name (here and here), aim to illustrate that being a Republic does not necessarily require others to be forced to call you exactly as you demand! I find it very humorous and very improving. Ofcourse, you can disagree on my (and the others') priorities considering improvement, but you must admit that it is a very amusing parallel... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 08:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Just to clarify; I'm not actually grumpy about it. Jkelly 20:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- I knew you wouldn't be J. Your humor is evident. Did it make you think though? NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 20:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, let's see. I don't think FWKAT would be automatically adminned. In fact, I think that when FWKAT discussed applying for
EUadmin membership, I would make it widely known that I would vote "Strong oppose -- username, also other issues.", and some other editors would think I was being completely unreasonable, while others would say "Well, Jkelly has been a trusted admin for a while now, and we should probably be careful here." Jkelly 22:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, let's see. I don't think FWKAT would be automatically adminned. In fact, I think that when FWKAT discussed applying for
- Hmmm... You mean that you'd just oppose because he dared mess with your name -OR- would you oppose to FWKAT applying for adminship as FWKAT, rather than as "Republic of Jkelly"? I really am puzzled, but then again, maybe it was intentional... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 22:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Wicca / Emberverse series
I thought mentioning the series in the section on WICCA IN POPULAR FICTION would be appropriate - the Wiccan religion and those who practce it are a major theme of the novel -Paullaw
Exodus 17 1/2
It's at 22:17 in the link given in the article. I could believe that different Bible translations give slightly different verse numberings, though. FreplySpang (talk) 22:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, you know those English kings, can't turn your back on them.... :-) Cheers, FreplySpang (talk) 22:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Last reply
In the series of my last contributions, I post my reply to your text on my user page. In case you wish to reply to me you are welcome to send me an e-mail of post a comment on my blog.
You may feel that I behave strangely. It is obvious since you don't know now more than one-and-half year struggle on cs: during which I was desysopped as a bureacrat. If you are interested in problems of small wikies, then you can read m:Requests for comments/Cswiki issues, m:Meta:Babel#Czech Wikipedia in disarray and before it will deleted [1] as well.
In my view conflicts with some cs: editors are unsolveable. They or me should leave cs:, there is no place for both the parties. These conflict was often transmissed to Meta and now to en:. This is unhappy because both Meta and en: has nothing to do with cs:. But I am sorry that both Meta editors and Board of Directors did nothing to improve the situation, they just washed their hands like Pontius Pilate. Their choice but I cannot participate at the project where my rights are overlooked. I am fully decided, it is not a question of one conflict here.
"You can still edit your User talk page even while blocked." ??? Is that technically possible? I never heard about it.
I hate translating, I find it very boring work. And my English is not perfect as well.
So I wish you good luck and thank you for your deleting of my pages. -- Vít Zvánovec 10:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)