Talk:Aviator sunglasses: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 85.198.175.53 - "" |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
"Aviator sunglasses" would be an appropriate encyclopaedic title for this style of eyewear. I don't believe they are exclusive to Ray-Ban so the choice of title for this article perhaps gives undue weight to one manufacturer, rather than focusing on the style of glasses. I would therefore suggest moving this back to [[Aviator sunglasses]] and not making it sound as if Ray-Ban is the only manufacturer of this style, although obviously they must be mentioned and acknowleded. [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]) 18:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
"Aviator sunglasses" would be an appropriate encyclopaedic title for this style of eyewear. I don't believe they are exclusive to Ray-Ban so the choice of title for this article perhaps gives undue weight to one manufacturer, rather than focusing on the style of glasses. I would therefore suggest moving this back to [[Aviator sunglasses]] and not making it sound as if Ray-Ban is the only manufacturer of this style, although obviously they must be mentioned and acknowleded. [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]) 18:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
Who knows whether all aviators are or ain't no raybans? But everybody all over the world knows all raybans ain't no aviators! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.198.175.53|85.198.175.53]] ([[User talk:85.198.175.53|talk]]) 12: |
Who knows whether all aviators are or ain't no raybans? But everybody all over the world knows all raybans ain't no aviators! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.198.175.53|85.198.175.53]] ([[User talk:85.198.175.53|talk]]) 12:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 12:50, 8 October 2012
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Fashion Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Randolph engineering
The line about Randolph engineering is as far as I know correct, but not in the citation give, which also looks unreliable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.201.128 (talk) 02:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Development date
Would somebody clarify the date on the development here? They can't have been developed by Ray Ban in 1965, for Douglas MacArthur to wade ashore wearing them 20 years previously!!Arejaypee (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
"Kings of your Eyes"
What are the qualia for getting the fact that Aviators are the Kings of your Eyes added to this page? Do studies need to be cited? Is there a particular authority that can be appealed to?
I can understand the revert based on lack of citation, but I'd like to get it added legitamately(sic).
- What the wobbegong are you talking about? --Haizum μολὼν λαβέ 06:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
List of wearers
The list of people who wear them is ridiculous (and not least for the reason that Rob Halford isn't there, but Sam Totman is). It's pointless, and should probably be removed. --Grindlyth (talk) 19:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I concur. You could pretty much just pull up any gossip/celebrity rag and print out a list of names in it. Chances are, most own at least a pair of Aviators. List a name or two of people who made it famous in the article, and call it at that. 24.23.104.235 (talk) 05:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Are all aviator sunglasses made by Ray-Ban? If not, this article may be inappropriately titled.
"Aviator sunglasses" would be an appropriate encyclopaedic title for this style of eyewear. I don't believe they are exclusive to Ray-Ban so the choice of title for this article perhaps gives undue weight to one manufacturer, rather than focusing on the style of glasses. I would therefore suggest moving this back to Aviator sunglasses and not making it sound as if Ray-Ban is the only manufacturer of this style, although obviously they must be mentioned and acknowleded. Mabalu (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Who knows whether all aviators are or ain't no raybans? But everybody all over the world knows all raybans ain't no aviators! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.198.175.53 (talk) 12:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)