Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tulip: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:44, 10 May 2006

Tulip

A tough subject to get through FPC, but I think this pic has got it.

Nominate and Support --Fir0002 www 07:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. You're right, that is a tough subject to get through. Anything subject that simple has to really stand out to get the votes here. I do like it and I'm not entirely sure how it could be improved.. Perhaps better framing, with no tulips in the background cut out of the frame. Perhaps a more vertical crop. I'm not sure. :) I'll keep an open mind. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 10:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that's all of the shot I've got to work with. This pic wasn't taken by me but a friend, and that was all he took. --Fir0002 www 10:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support. Beautiful. Good resolution, nice lighting. The composition is fairly attractive. Maybe I'm baised because I love gardening, but I think this image is FP material. --Pharaoh Hound 12:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support. Has a bit of simplicity I think since the flower's interior side or something like that is not shown. --Brand спойт 13:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support agree, the flower is not doing anything terribly exciting, but that's more of an artistic consideration. It would illustrate Tulip very well indeed. Stevage 14:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC) I was too harsh. Support. Stevage 08:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and encyclopedical. Bertilvidet 15:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Plain but encyclopedic. bcasterline t 15:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. howch e ng {chat} 16:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amalas =^_^= 18:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's absolutely flippin' gorgeous! Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 20:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 20:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good picture. --Lewk_of_S e rthic _contrib ^talk 03:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support You're right, Fir, it probably is quite a tough subject to get through FPC.. flowers and sunsets and insects oh my!!! drumguy8800 - speak 03:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's nice, but I don't see what qualifies it as an FP. It's neither striking nor adds significantly to the article, IMO. There are many other shots in the article just as good. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 15:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Little encyclopaedic value. asnatu 17:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dante Alighieri.--K.C. Tang 00:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support The picture is amazing and it goes with the main article Tulip very well. -- BWF89 02:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 *'''Oppose'''. Little encyclopaedic value. [[User:Asnatu wiki|asnatu]] 17:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Oppose''' per Dante Alighieri.--[[User:K.C. Tang|K.C. Tang]] 00:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Strong Support''' The picture is amazing and it goes with the main article [[Tulip]] very well. -- [[User:BWF89|BWF89]] 02:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)