Jump to content

Royal commission: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tommo 87 (talk | contribs)
Tommo 87 (talk | contribs)
Line 139: Line 139:
* [[Pearson commission]] (1973–78), Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury
* [[Pearson commission]] (1973–78), Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury
* [[Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure]] (1981)
* [[Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure]] (1981)
* [[Royal Commission on Electoral Reform]] (1997)
* [[Royal Commission on the Voting System]] (1997)
* [[Royal Commission on Long Term Care for the Elderly]] (1998)

* [[Royal Commission on Long Term Care for the Elderly]] (1998)
* [[Royal Commission on Long Term Care for the Elderly]] (1998)



Revision as of 18:29, 3 December 2012

The term Royal Commission may also be used in the United Kingdom to describe the group of Lords Commissioners who may act in the stead of the Sovereign to grant Royal Assent to legislation passed by Parliament.

In Commonwealth realms and other monarchies a Royal Commission is a major ad-hoc formal public inquiry into a defined issue. They have been held in various countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Saudi Arabia. A Royal Commission is similar in function to a Commission of Enquiry (or Inquiry) found in other countries such as Ireland, South Africa, and Hong Kong.

A Royal Commissioner has considerable powers, generally greater even than those of a judge but restricted to the Terms of Reference of the Commission. The Commission is created by the Head of State (the Sovereign, or his/her representative in the form of a Governor-General or Governor) on the advice of the Government and formally appointed by Letters Patent. In practice—unlike lesser forms of inquiry—once a Commission has started the government cannot stop it. Consequently governments are usually very careful about framing the Terms of Reference and generally include in them a date by which the commission must finish.

Royal Commissions are called to look into matters of great importance and usually controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions.

Many Royal Commissions last many years and, often, a different government is left to respond to the findings. In Australia—and particularly New South Wales—Royal Commissions have been investigations into police and government corruption and organised crime using the very broad coercive powers of the Royal Commissioner to defeat the protective systems that powerful, but corrupt, public officials had used to shield themselves from conventional investigation.

Royal Commissions are usually chaired by one or more notable figures. Because of their quasi-judicial powers the Commissioners are often retired senior judges.

Royal Commissions usually involve research into an issue, consultations with experts both within and outside of government and public consultations as well. The Warrant may grant immense investigatory powers, including summoning witnesses under oath, offering of indemnities, seizing of documents and other evidence (sometimes including those normally protected, such as classified information), holding hearings in camera if necessary and—in a few cases—compelling all government officials to aid in the execution of the Commission.

The results of Royal Commissions are published in, often, massive reports of findings containing policy recommendations. (Due to the verbose nature of the titles of these formal documents – for example, the Royal commission into whether there has been corrupt or criminal conduct by any Western Australian Police Officer – they are commonly known by the name of the principal Commissioner.) While these reports are often quite influential, with the government enacting some or all recommendations into law, the work of some Commissions have been almost completely ignored by the government. In other cases, where the Commissioner has departed from the Warranted terms, the commission has been dissolved by a superior court.

Notable Royal Commissions

Australia

  • The mainland states held a number of Royal Commissions into the Railway Gauge issue.

Commonwealth of Australia

New South Wales

Queensland

South Australia

Victoria

Western Australia

Bahrain

Canada

Hong Kong

  • Commission of Inquiry on Allegations relating to the Hong Kong Institute of Education (2007)
  • Commission of Inquiry on the New Airport (1998–99)
  • Commission of Inquiry into the Garley Building Fire (1996–97)

India

Malaysia

New Zealand

Saudi Arabia

  • Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu (1975) in planning, development, construction, operation and maintenance of the various infrastructure and services of Jubail and Yanbu industrial cities.

United Kingdom

References

  1. ^ http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/r.christie/thomas_royal_commission_1980.pdf
  2. ^ "Report of the Royal Commission to inquire into the Crash on Mount Erebus, Antarctica of a DC10 Aircraft operated by Air New Zealand Limited - Introduction and Prologue" (PDF). 1981. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  3. ^ Royal Commission on the Pike River Mine disaster
  4. ^ Hartevelt, John. "Pike River disaster inquiry announced". Stuff.co.nz. APN. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
  5. ^ Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failures Caused by the Canterbury Earthquakes
  6. ^ A copy of the Report of the Commission is available at: http://eppi.dippam.ac.uk/documents/9883/eppi_pages/217631 (accessed 18/11/2012)
  7. ^ The Times, 22 November 1904, Index p. 7