Imperative mood: Difference between revisions
fixed the subjunctive verb mood mood to the right tense |
→Morphology: rv vandalism |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Morphology == |
== Morphology == |
||
Formulation of the [[English language|English]] imperative simply uses the bare [[infinitive]] form of the verb. The infinitive form usually corresponds to the second-person present [[Realis mood#Indicative|indicative]] form, with the exception of |
Formulation of the [[English language|English]] imperative simply uses the bare [[infinitive]] form of the verb. The infinitive form usually corresponds to the second-person present [[Realis mood#Indicative|indicative]] form, with the exception of "to be''. The [[grammatical subject|subject]] of these sentences is usually understood as ''you'' (the [[Grammatical person|second person]]) except in the case of "Let's" which implies first person and at least a second person. Other languages such as [[Latin language|Latin]], [[French language|French]] and [[German language|German]] have several [[inflection|inflected]] imperative forms, which can vary according to grammatical categories such as: |
||
* Distinct [[Grammatical conjugation|conjugation]] patterns; |
* Distinct [[Grammatical conjugation|conjugation]] patterns; |
Revision as of 03:06, 18 December 2012
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
The imperative mood (abbreviated IMP) expresses commands or requests as a grammatical mood. These commands or requests urge the audience to act a certain way. It also may signal a prohibition, permission, or any other kind of exhortation.
Morphology
Formulation of the English imperative simply uses the bare infinitive form of the verb. The infinitive form usually corresponds to the second-person present indicative form, with the exception of "to be. The subject of these sentences is usually understood as you (the second person) except in the case of "Let's" which implies first person and at least a second person. Other languages such as Latin, French and German have several inflected imperative forms, which can vary according to grammatical categories such as:
- Distinct conjugation patterns;
- Grammatical number;
- Distinct grammatical persons.
For instance, Latin regular forms can exist:
- amā (singular); amāte (plural) ← from infinitive amāre, to 'love'
- monē (singular); monēte (plural) ← from monēre, to 'advise' or 'warn'
- audī (singular); audīte (plural) ← from audīre, to 'hear'
- cape (singular); capite (plural) ← from capĕre, to 'take'
- rege (singular); regite (plural) ← from regĕre, to 'reign'.
Some consider this richness of forms useful for a better understanding, particularly because no subject pronoun normally specifies with the imperative.
Usage
The use of the imperative mood may be seen as impolite, inappropriate or even offensive in certain circumstances.[1] Commonly, polite speech will instead express the same thing as a question or statement, such as:
- Could you come here for a moment?
- It would be great if you made us a drink.
- I beg you to stop.
and not as demands, such as:
- Come here.
- Go and make me a drink.
- Stop!
Politeness strategies (for instance, indirect speech acts) can seem more appropriate in order not to threaten a conversational partner in their needs of self-determination and territory: the partner's negative face should not appear threatened.[2] As a result, the imperative mood does not require someone to be direct, confrontational, nor over-bearing.
The imperative mood's appropriateness depends on such factors as psychological and social relationships, as well as the speaker’s basic communicative intention (illocutionary force).[citation needed] For example, the speaker may have the simple intention to offer something, to wish or permit something, or just to apologize, and not to manipulate their conversational partner.[citation needed] In such cases, people will not place restriction on the use of imperative[citation needed]:
- Come to the party tomorrow!
- Just eat the apple if you want!
- Have a nice trip!
- Pardon me.
First-person plural form
In some languages, including French and Spanish, in addition to the second-person imperative form shown above, there also exists a first-person plural (we) imperative form. This form, similar to the second-person imperative form, except conjugated in the first-person plural, usually translates to English as let's (short for let us). For example, the French national anthem, La Marseillaise, includes the words Marchons, marchons! (Let's march, let's march!). Irish has imperative forms in all three persons and both numbers, although the first person singular is most commonly found in the negative (e.g. ná cloisim sin arís "let me not hear that again"). In Finnish, there are two ways of forming a first-person plural imperative. A standard version exists, but it is typically replaced colloquially by the impersonal tense. mennä -to go menkäämme -let's go (standard) mennään -let's go (colloquial)
Indicative and prohibitive mood
The prohibitive mood (abbreviated PROH) negates the imperative mood. The two moods often seem different in word order or in morphology.
English
In English, the imperative mood uses the same word order as the indicative mood, while the prohibitive mood uses a different word order if you appears in the sentence. [dubious – discuss]
Indicative | Imperative / Prohibitive | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−you | +you | ||||
do | will | ||||
Affirmative | You go. | Go! | You go! | You will go! | |
Negative | not | You do not go. | Do not go! | - | You will not go! |
-n't | You don't go. | Don't go! | Don't you go! | You won't go! |
French
Similarly, French uses different word order for the imperative and prohibitive moods:
- Donne-le-leur ! (Give it to them!)
- Ne le leur donne pas ! (Don't give it to them!)
The prohibitive has the same word order as the indicative. See French personal pronouns#Clitic order for detail.
Hebrew
In Hebrew, the imperative mood is derived from the 2nd-person indicative future tense inflections, generally by removing the ת־ 2nd-person prefix of אית״ן prefix set (which indicates future verbs). In Modern Hebrew the future mode is often used instead of the imperative. The negative consists of al אל (like the negative do not) + verb in the future mode. In Classical Hebrew negatives are sometimes consists of the negation lo ("no/not", Hebrew: לא), e.g. לא תרצח ("Thou shalt not kill") in the Ten Commandments.
Future Indicative | Imperative / Prohibitive | |
---|---|---|
Affirmative | telekh – תלך (You will go) |
lekh – לך (Go!) |
Negative | lo telekh – לא תלך (You will not go) |
al telekh – אל תלך (Don't go! / You shall not go) |
Japanese
Japanese uses separate verb forms as shown below. For the verb kaku (write):
Indicative | Imperative / Prohibitive | |
---|---|---|
Affirmative | 書く kaku | 書け kake |
Negative | 書かない kakanai | 書くな kakuna |
See also the suffixes 〜なさい (–nasai) and 〜下さい/ください (–kudasai).
Mandarin
Standard Chinese uses different words of negation for the indicative and the prohibitive moods. For the verb 做 zuò (do):
Indicative | Imperative / Prohibitive | |
---|---|---|
Affirmative | 做 zuò | 做 zuò |
Negative | 不做 búzuo | 别做 biézuò |
Sanskrit
In Sanskrit, लोट लकार (lot lakar) is used with the verb to form the imperative mood. To form the negative, न (na) is placed before the verb in the imperative mood.
Footnotes
References
- Austin, J. L. How to do things with words, Oxford, Clarendon Press 1962.
- Schmecken, H. Orbis Romanus, Paderborn, Schöningh 1975, ISBN 3 506 10330.