User talk:Alexrexpvt

Your review

Thank you for your review and comments. It helps to understand Wikipedia rules and expectations. I can add to the text: "Lothane have been named as a recipient of the 2011 Thomas S. Szasz Award in the professional category for Outstanding Contributions to the Cause of Civil Liberties" with an internal link to Thomas S. Szasz on Wikipedia. According to International psychoanalysis(http://internationalpsychoanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/LothaneSzazAward1.pdf), the "Professional Award is given to a specialist, such as psychiatrist, physician, psychologist, sociologist, or economist, who has made advances in civil liberties on a theoretical or practical level." I will be working on gathering more information. Kind regards, Tama Tamakay (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Genco Music

Umm, excuse me but you have no reason to deny the creation of the Wikipedia page I've created. It is a page about a record label that has recently started up that I do not own. However, I am apart of it. You have absolutely no reason to deny me the creation of that page. It's not a conflict of interest. And it's about a reputable company with employees. I think you're just being selfish and abusive of your power. Unless you give me a justified explanation of why this page cannot be created, then I am taking this matter above your head. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kweiss1993 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

A notice was placed at the top of the page that set out the reasons for declining the submission. To be notable enough to merit an entry on Wikipedia, a subject must have received "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:GNG). The only reference given was to the company's own web site, which is not independent, nor is it reliable for the purposes of establishing notability (though it can of course be used to prove certain facts about the company itself). No company is inherently notable, and you should make sure that the company satisfies the guidelines on notability (organizations and companies) before resubmitting the article for creation.

I should also mention that writing about a company with which you are associated might give rise to a conflict of interest, and so you should consider reading this page, which offers advice "for new editors who want to write and edit Wikipedia articles about a subject they are affiliated with." Alexrexpvt (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Original Build detailing an aviation TV show called The Flightline

Is any part of my page about the Flightline TV show acceptable or do I need to completely start over??? Please advise & thank you Spike1962 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spike1962 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

I can no longer see the original page that you submitted, but if memory serves all of it was copied and pasted from a copyrighted source, which isn't permitted on Wikpedia. Please see WP:CFAQ for more information. If you'd still like to create an article about the television show, you'll need to write it in your own words, and also show that the subject is notable enough to merit an entry on Wikipedia. The simplest way to do this is to provide evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:GNG). If you need any help with this, or anything else, feel free to visit the Teahouse, which is a friendly forum for new editors. Alexrexpvt (talk) 01:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Queen Mother Dr Delois Blakely Deletion

hi this is my first post on wiki for " Dr Delois Blakely " so please lets me know if i made any mistakes. Thank you. I saw that you have deleted my sandbox and an article for Queen Mother. I worked for her and she gave me rights to use her pages and images and information directly. You can call or email her at queenmothernews@gmail.com or (212) 368-3739.

 This is her facebook page
 http://www.facebook.com/QueenMotherDrDeloisBlakely/info
 and these are her own websites 
 http://newfuturefoundation.com/about/board-and-executives/
 http://queenmamaafrica.com/History/history.html

I spent 7 days working on her wiki-biography and she also saw and approved the information on it. Please lets me know if you can reverted her page back. Thank you for your time . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minh0409 (talk • contribs)

If the copyright owner wants to "donate" the material to Wikipedia, she should follow one of the procedures set out here. If you look at the section on "Granting us permission to copy material already online", you'll see that the simplest way to release the material is to put the appropriate "copyleft" notice on the web site. The alternative is to email the appropriate department at Wikipedia. If permission is granted to use the material, you'll still need to ensure that the tone of the article is neutral; and that reliable, independent, secondary sources are used to establish notability and to verify any factual claims. Alexrexpvt (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Biher-Tigrinya

Yeah, I'm aware that page. However, the Biher-Tigrinya are a separate ethnic group in Eritrea. For some reason they were added in a page about the Tigray ethnic group in Ethiopia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianForever1 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, the Tigray-Tigrinya article is about the Tigrinya ethnic group, and the "Tigray" of the title refers simply to the region; the Tigray (or Tigre) themselves are the subject of Tigre people. I see from the Tigray-Tigrinya talk page, which you can see here, that the name of the article has been the subject of constant dispute, and I'm not sure that creating a second (or third) article on the subject would be helpful. A way forward would be to propose on the Tigray-Tigrinya talk page that the article be renamed to avoid confusion, though it does seem that a consensus was reached in the past to keep the name Tigray-Tigrinya. (If I've misunderstood the situation, feel free to correct me). Alexrexpvt (talk) 20:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Let me jump in to clarify a little. User:CanadianForever1 will agree that Biher-Tigrinya people (which is what the article should be called if we follow naming conventions so far established) share a common ancestry with the Tigray-Tigrinya_people. However, they are now considered a separate ethnic group. It is therefore completely legitimate to create a separate page for them. አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) (talk) 20:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Although all neighbouring peoples worldwide display a common ancestry, I wouldn't really say the Biher-Tigrinya are 'now' considered a separate ethnic group. They pretty much always were. But I agree. There needs to be a separate page for them.CanadianForever1 (talk) 20:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Of course, I don't mean they suddenly came from think air. I just mean they are now recognized as a seperate ethnic group አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

I've looked again through the sources you provided in your AfC submission, and the sources listed on the Tigray-Tigrinya people and Tigre people pages. Most mention only Tigrinya-speakers and Tigre-speakers, but this source suggests there's a tripartite division in play: the "Tigrinya of Eritrea", "the Tigray [...] of [the] Tigray [...] Province of Ethiopia", and "[t]he Tigre of Eritrea", although it says the first two are "culturally and linguistically" identical.

The existing Tigray-Tigrinya article, then, effectively discusses the first two groups, and the third group is covered by Tigre people. Your argument, I presume, is that the Eritrean Tigrinya, or Biher-Tigrinya, should have a separate article. (This of course also raises the question of whether a separate page should be created for the Tigray subgroup). In principle I (now) can see no reason this shouldn't be the case, but it's still contingent on finding reliable sources that discuss the Biher-Triginya as a distinct ethnic group. (As far as I can tell, the existing sources, though they're specific to Eritrea, mention only a distinction between Tigrinya- and Tigre-speakers, without discussing the Biher-Tigrinya as an ethnic group distinct from the Tigray.) If you can do that, then resubmit the article for creation and I'll happily create it, although I see that you're a registered user, and can create a new article without going through the AfC process.

If you have the time and inclination, you might want to add some text to the top of Tigray-Tigrinya article spelling out the difference between the three groups. Alexrexpvt (talk) 21:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Vacuum Polarization

There's no approval process for changes to articles, as such. Just click on the edit tab at the top of Vacuum polarization, which allows you to edit the whole page, including the first paragraph, or one of the section edit tabs to the right of the page; make whatever changes you think are appropriate; add a brief description of what you've done in the "edit summary" field; then click save. It's no different from working on the page in your sandbox. The simplest thing is probably to copy and paste the work you've already done into the article itself, being careful not to remove the category tags at the bottom of the page. You might find this guide helpful. You can also get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Alexrexpvt (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know how to make the proper minor edits. I have done so. Thank you.

I have removed my original question/discussion post since your answer below has covered all the issues there raised.

Now I would like to know how do I clear my Sandbox. At the moment my sandbox is "cluttered" with my previous NEW page request which we both know was a mistake, has been withdrawn, and is over so I'd like to move past it and remove everything from my sandbox so it is cleared and ready for new work. I don't see any clear Delete/Clear/Edit section on my Sandbox in order to do any of those actions. please inform.

I have merely "edited" my sandbox page and now my sandbox is indeed "empty" but the banner across the stop still reads about the attempt to create a NEW page for vacuum polarization which is no longer necessary. May I ask how do I remove even this title banner on this now empty sandbox?

Thank you very much Muonphysicist (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

When you submitted your page to AfC, the content was moved to another page and a redirect set up on your sandbox. I've removed the redirect, so you should be able to use your sandbox again. Alexrexpvt (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Afc/Mike Glowacki

The article was created because musician has release an album and Wikipedia is a great source to find out more information. I have added the list of songs with references to the Copyright Encyclopedia for verification. Please re-review the article. Thanks and Happy New Year! Here is the link to the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mike_Glowacki Best Regards, Annamarie Annamarie Blaha (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid that releasing an album doesn't in itself make a person notable enough to merit an entry on Wikipedia. Please have a look at the notability criteria for composers, which you can find here. You'll see that you need to provide evidence that the subject has written a "notable composition", where "notable" means that the composition "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:GNG); or that one of his compositions has won a major award, influenced a notable musician, or received nontrivial coverage in "standard reference books". Entries made by the subject on copyrightencyclopedia.com aren't reliable or independent for the purposes of establishing notability. Alexrexpvt (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

The article contains factual information written and verified with Mike Glowacki regarding his education and history. The article is informational and is not an advertisment. What recommendations do you have to make the article worthy of being an entry on Wikipedia? As a consumer I look to wikipedia for all sorts of information and I would look to wikipedia for information on Mike Glowacki. Thanks for all you help! AnnamarieAnnamarie Blaha (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

In principle, you have to show that the subject satisfies the general notability guideline at the very least, i. e., that he "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"; and also that he satisfies the notability guidelines for composers, which I mentioned earlier. Unfortunately I think it's unlikely that the subject, as a church music director, small-business owner, and composer of a non-notable album, meets the criteria. See also WP:ENEN.

Thanks for guideline

Sir thanks for guiding me. My Intention to create the Article " Kanabhai S amrutiya" was just that People mostly know him by the name Kanabhai S Amrutiya. Its ok if it can not be created. Please Add Search tag to already existing page " Kantilal Amrutiya" So that if anybody Searches for "Kanabhai Amrutiya" or "Kanabhai" he can get to "Kantilal amrutiya" Page

Also the page Kantilal Amrutiya is Edited by me only and 95% to 97% information is added by me only. So please include my name in Editors list of page "Kantilal Amrutiya"

Kalubhai M Chauhan Kmcajanta (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Thank you for letting me know it's just that when I found out that they are not renewing Pair of Kings I was very upset. We should really keep in touch so we can edit more things together as a team.