Talk:Aulus Gabinius: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:37, 25 January 2013

Biography: Military / Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Biography / Classical Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Unsourced comment

I found this unsourced comment toward the bottom of the article. — Eoghanacht ^talk 16:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(I think parts of this were lifted from the 1911 encyclopedia)

Change of 'majestas' to 'maiestas'

I switched the j in majestas to the original latin i, as it seemed faintly ridiculous to quote the latin term rather than using the english description for his charge, but then quote the latin word in an Englisised version. Best, in my view, to stick to one or another. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.134.152 (talk) 11:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |military-work-group=yes|military-priority=Mid
 }}
-{{WPMILHIST|class=start|Classical=yes|Biography=yes}}
+{{WPMILHIST
+|class=start
+|<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
+|B-Class-1=no
+<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
+|B-Class-2=no
+<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
+|B-Class-3=no
+<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
+|B-Class-4=yes
+<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
+|B-Class-5=no
+|Classical-task-force=yes
+|Biography-task-force=yes
+}}
 ==Unsourced comment==