User talk:Zimmarod: Difference between revisions
→Warning: new section |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
About yout restoration of the links deleted by Grandmaster. The link that is dead appears to be available on waybackmachine. http://web.archive.org/web/20100819235917/http://www.ingushetia.org/history/shnirelman_bit_alanamy/ However, since I can't read Russian, somoeone who can should check it is the same thing. Grandmaster's deletion of those links was certainly not correct - they were not duplicate articles and if one of them had a dead link he should have just removed the link (or said it was dead) and not deleted the whole reference. [[User:Meowy|<font face="Trebuchet MS, verdana, sans serif" color="#0088BB">'''Meowy'''</font>]] 19:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC) |
About yout restoration of the links deleted by Grandmaster. The link that is dead appears to be available on waybackmachine. http://web.archive.org/web/20100819235917/http://www.ingushetia.org/history/shnirelman_bit_alanamy/ However, since I can't read Russian, somoeone who can should check it is the same thing. Grandmaster's deletion of those links was certainly not correct - they were not duplicate articles and if one of them had a dead link he should have just removed the link (or said it was dead) and not deleted the whole reference. [[User:Meowy|<font face="Trebuchet MS, verdana, sans serif" color="#0088BB">'''Meowy'''</font>]] 19:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Hi, if Grandmaster broke rules with his restoring of the archived AR item, I think that it is best to just let administrators deal with it rather than other editors placing it back in the archive. [[User:Meowy|<font face="Trebuchet MS, verdana, sans serif" color="#0088BB">'''Meowy'''</font>]] 23:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC) |
:Hi, if Grandmaster broke rules with his restoring of the archived AR item, I think that it is best to just let administrators deal with it rather than other editors placing it back in the archive. [[User:Meowy|<font face="Trebuchet MS, verdana, sans serif" color="#0088BB">'''Meowy'''</font>]] 23:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Warning == |
|||
After a discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&diff=537481103&oldid=537480054 at AE], you are warned about [[Wikipedia:ARBAA2#Standard_discretionary_sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] related to articles concerning Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts, broadly interpreted. Should any uninvolved administrator believe you are edit warring or otherwise engaging in disruptive editing, they may block you or impose other sanctions. The prohibition against edit-warring also prohibits continuing edit wars started by others, which means that you may therefore be sanctioned even for one revert if it is part of a broader edit war. --'''[[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]]''' ~ ([[User talk:Lord Roem|talk]]) 02:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:48, 10 February 2013
zimmU: viva New York!
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Katarovank Monastery, Nagorno Karabakh Republic, 4th-17th century.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Katarovank Monastery, Nagorno Karabakh Republic, 4th-17th century.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. When you recently edited Nagorno-Karabakh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Umlauts and Kingdom of Armenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Victor Schnirelmann
About yout restoration of the links deleted by Grandmaster. The link that is dead appears to be available on waybackmachine. http://web.archive.org/web/20100819235917/http://www.ingushetia.org/history/shnirelman_bit_alanamy/ However, since I can't read Russian, somoeone who can should check it is the same thing. Grandmaster's deletion of those links was certainly not correct - they were not duplicate articles and if one of them had a dead link he should have just removed the link (or said it was dead) and not deleted the whole reference. Meowy 19:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, if Grandmaster broke rules with his restoring of the archived AR item, I think that it is best to just let administrators deal with it rather than other editors placing it back in the archive. Meowy 23:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Warning
After a discussion at AE, you are warned about discretionary sanctions related to articles concerning Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts, broadly interpreted. Should any uninvolved administrator believe you are edit warring or otherwise engaging in disruptive editing, they may block you or impose other sanctions. The prohibition against edit-warring also prohibits continuing edit wars started by others, which means that you may therefore be sanctioned even for one revert if it is part of a broader edit war. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)