Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowle Village Cricket Club: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''', fails to meet the criteria of [[WP:CRIN]], which requires clubs to have played at the highest level of cricket, the ECB Premier Leagues, to assume notability. It is an old club, but cricket clubs typically are, so it isn't extraordinary in that regard. '''[[User:Harrias|<font color="#00cc33">Harrias</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<font color="#009900">talk</font>]]</sup> 09:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', fails to meet the criteria of [[WP:CRIN]], which requires clubs to have played at the highest level of cricket, the ECB Premier Leagues, to assume notability. It is an old club, but cricket clubs typically are, so it isn't extraordinary in that regard. '''[[User:Harrias|<font color="#00cc33">Harrias</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<font color="#009900">talk</font>]]</sup> 09:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nom and Harrias. Unfortunately the club hasn't played at the highest level of recreational cricket, which in this case is the [[Birmingham and District Premier League]]. [[User:AssociateAffiliate|Howzat?Out!Out!Out!]] ([[User talk:AssociateAffiliate|talk]]) 13:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom and Harrias. Unfortunately the club hasn't played at the highest level of recreational cricket, which in this case is the [[Birmingham and District Premier League]]. [[User:AssociateAffiliate|Howzat?Out!Out!Out!]] ([[User talk:AssociateAffiliate|talk]]) 13:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' I agree with user Harrias.--[[User:Soroboro|Soroboro]] ([[User talk:Soroboro|talk]]) 02:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:18, 27 February 2013
- Knowle Village Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like a non-notable sports club despite its exceptional age. Doing my standard search for reliable sources (Google News archives and Google Books with quotation marks) turned up passing mentions in a couple of news articles and references to books published by the club, but none of the independent significant coverage necessary for a Wikipedia article. CtP (t • c) 00:55, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, fails to meet the criteria of WP:CRIN, which requires clubs to have played at the highest level of cricket, the ECB Premier Leagues, to assume notability. It is an old club, but cricket clubs typically are, so it isn't extraordinary in that regard. Harrias talk 09:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Harrias. Unfortunately the club hasn't played at the highest level of recreational cricket, which in this case is the Birmingham and District Premier League. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 13:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with user Harrias.--Soroboro (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)