Talk:Christian privilege: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Bias: I do not agree |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:I agree. The existence of such privilege is certainly very controversial. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 21:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
:I agree. The existence of such privilege is certainly very controversial. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 21:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
::I do not agree with the unsigned user. "Christian privilege" is not only political argument.--[[User:Soroboro|Soroboro]] ([[User talk:Soroboro|talk]]) 19:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:40, 18 March 2013
Christianity Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Politics Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Bias
This reads as a political argument, not as a encyclopedia entry.
It clarifies at the start of the article that this is an idea, based on the work related to the idea of "white privilege".
But these are not accepted facts - they are political arguments.
Is there agreement/disagreement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.225.165 (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC) the article needs more detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.168.86 (talk) 00:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. The existence of such privilege is certainly very controversial. Mangoe (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I do not agree with the unsigned user. "Christian privilege" is not only political argument.--Soroboro (talk) 19:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC)