Jump to content

User talk:Jimfbleak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 117: Line 117:


They are no longer applicable, every source is healthy and the whole page has been gutted anyway.
They are no longer applicable, every source is healthy and the whole page has been gutted anyway.

Jim, please take a look at what the redden editor is doing to the article, please notice the comments and the nature of them. This is a spiteful person and I would like to have something, anything don about it.

[[User:Ngoesseringer|Ngoesseringer]] ([[User talk:Ngoesseringer|talk]]) 10:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


[[User:Ngoesseringer|Ngoesseringer]] ([[User talk:Ngoesseringer|talk]]) 10:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Ngoesseringer|Ngoesseringer]] ([[User talk:Ngoesseringer|talk]]) 10:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:29, 2 April 2013



Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

User:Jimfbleak/Talkfloat



Delete my article of Arpan Tanna

Hi Jimfbleak,

Before few minutes I created a article named Arpan_tanna, but it deleted by you. Please know me about why you deleted that? It was about my personal Info. My email address : arpan.ec24@gmail.com

Thanks!

Delete my article

Hi,

I got message from you, I deleted your article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.

Please provide me information how to make independent verifiable my article?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpan tanna (talkcontribs) 07:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Milkwood its Milkstone

well jim im sorry if i am wasting your time, but do you think that was necessary to intimidate either that or my temper is making my judgement hazy since its bad enough to have my own article on death's door along with getting kicked in the groin as if i was somekind of stupid child who smokes weed for a living, i take this topic seriously.--Indienews (talk) 23:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, hope you're well. We posted on FB and twitter about George's article and quite a few people contributed to the page. Looks like they found articles online that even I missed.

Overall, are you happy with the extent of sources? Also, are we on our way to being safe of the dreaded COI label?

As always, very grateful for your guidance and advice.

Ngoesseringer (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All comments noted. Thanks. Amending accordingly. --Akpantue (talk) 08:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blak Prophetz Page

Whatever your reasons were for deleting my page, fine but your remark, accusation lacks reliable evidence.

  • Unreliable insulting accusation remark by User:Jimfbleak who's statement " votes by one editor and his sockpuppets " is insulting. Please provide Reliable Source or evidence of his "sockpuppets" relations to the editor. As this is an direct implication of malicious use of the platform by the editor. The statement in itself is weak and considered a personal attack without Proof (truth) regardless of your position or rank in Wikipedia a statement like this is false without proof. Please back up your statement by demonstrating the relation between editor and the person you so namely call sockpuppets by means of IP addresses or other findings as this statement in itself is also considered an insult to the editor. Please provide sources for your statement.

Candy H (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a misunderstanding I think. The sockpuppet had no connection to User:John shaftman as far as I'm aware. Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Though I'm not sure why he is now signing as Candy H? Theroadislong (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say he, actually I'm a she. You do realize that Wikipedia allows you to use nicknames? If I was not permitted to change my nick name freely then why is it allowed? You statement in itself is still seeking justification to label me something which I'm not. Candy H (talk) 18:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted the page but did not close the AFD discussion. Just a reminder to do so. --Jayron32 02:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Nauru Reed Warbler

Sorry, I've been really busy- I had some space for it a few days ago, and then someone nominated one of my articles for deletion! I'll certainly find some time in the next few days. J Milburn (talk) 11:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted Don Buden; though he didn't have any photographs, he's given me the contact details of some people who may, and he's also sent me another article on the species (citation below) which I will be taking a look through. J Milburn (talk) 22:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Buden, D. W.; Franhert, S. (2010). "Birds collected by Otto Finsch in the Republic of Nauru, with notes on the history and current locations of the syntypes and other specimens of the Nauru Reed-Warbler, Acrocephalus rehsei (Finsch, 1883)". Journal of Afrotropical Zoology (Special Issue): 31–35.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

I am not sure why you deleted this page. I made corrections and contested it as to why it does provide notable information to users. Please return my page. Thanks Arielnorton (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Please let me know what I need to do to fix this page and have it returned to WP. Arielnorton (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion: George Ortiz

Hi I am not sure why you deleted the page I created and was planning on working on further. Could you please re-establish the page and let me finish it? Thanks!Gerelage (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Williams2013

My image is no copyright... it's my own work. The reason it doesn't have "Metadata" is because I don't upload raw images. I edit the colours, lighting, etc... on the program "Windows Live Photo Gallery" then use them. --Wudumindif (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upside Down Umbrella Roundabout.jpg

I was wondering was it a license or permission issue with File:Upside Down Umbrella Roundabout.jpg? I can't view the deleted file and the information with it. If it's the issue of the "Upside down umbrellas", COM:FOP would cover that. Bidgee (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, the article is being considered by deletion. I am so disappointed. Could you do anything to stop the process? These administrators are accusing 'thin air' and 'sock' and are utterly disrespectful. Please please help stop the deletion.

Ngoesseringer (talk) 05:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, this is so dispiriting. I really am dismayed by this all... The admin redpenofdoom has removed all sorts of important things, and now his page is down and I cannot even write this person! It seems like these people who are doing this must know each other, like it a concerted effort against the article. Could you please look into this matter? Do you have any further advice? I am really truly at a loss...

Ngoesseringer (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the numerous things the other admin has complained about, could you please remove the things he has placed on the top of my page? All sources are completely valid and I have removed the article that I authored.

Ngoesseringer (talk) 09:31, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, the redpenofdoom is harassing me and being terrible about things. I needed to restore the old page so that I could carefully go through it again and take out anything that isn't up to par. Could you please block this person for at least one day so that I could go through and fix the page? With all the deleting he's done he has caused me stress and upset. It is easier to correct if I can see how things were.

Ngoesseringer (talk) 09:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Could you please remove these?:

They are no longer applicable, every source is healthy and the whole page has been gutted anyway.

Jim, please take a look at what the redden editor is doing to the article, please notice the comments and the nature of them. This is a spiteful person and I would like to have something, anything don about it.

Ngoesseringer (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ngoesseringer (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]