Jump to content

User talk:Travers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hourick (talk | contribs)
→‎Club Quarter(s): new section
Line 24: Line 24:


If you feel that they need to be merged, by all means go ahead. I had plans to expand the three small articles but have never got around to the task. My only request would be redirect the smaller articles, and not delete them. That would keep it easier to recreate when enough material to expand them is gathered. Also, the structure of mother article for [[Sunderbans]] is not too comfortable yet. See how you can accommodate the smaller articles. Another area concern is the existence of 4 different protected reserves in the Sunderbans - 1 in India and 3 in Bangladesh. While the Indian reserve has a large enough article (repeating much of the mother article), the Bangladeshi articles are pretty underdeveloped. I think all 4 articles need non-preferential treatment. While the size of the article is a development issue, the existence of the articles are more of a structural issue. My experience tells me that existence of an individual article prompts more article development than anything else. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font face="Kristen ITC" color="deeppink">[[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya]]</font></span><sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup> 06:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
If you feel that they need to be merged, by all means go ahead. I had plans to expand the three small articles but have never got around to the task. My only request would be redirect the smaller articles, and not delete them. That would keep it easier to recreate when enough material to expand them is gathered. Also, the structure of mother article for [[Sunderbans]] is not too comfortable yet. See how you can accommodate the smaller articles. Another area concern is the existence of 4 different protected reserves in the Sunderbans - 1 in India and 3 in Bangladesh. While the Indian reserve has a large enough article (repeating much of the mother article), the Bangladeshi articles are pretty underdeveloped. I think all 4 articles need non-preferential treatment. While the size of the article is a development issue, the existence of the articles are more of a structural issue. My experience tells me that existence of an individual article prompts more article development than anything else. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font face="Kristen ITC" color="deeppink">[[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya]]</font></span><sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup> 06:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

== Club Quarter(s) ==

Looking at [[Club Quarters]], I agree it does need a substantial rewrite. When writing this article, I was a fairly new editor and never had the time to go back to edit this appropriately. While I don't think the article deserves to be deleted, as it is a business along the lines of [[Marriott Hotels & Resorts]], and it does need some substantial work. Thank you for being kind enough to bring it to my attention, but I currently have little time to give this article the attention it deserves.
--[[User:Hourick|Hourick]] ([[User talk:Hourick|talk]]) 14:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:46, 9 April 2013

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification

February 2013 Wikification Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

WikiProject Wikify April Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teletext, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subtitle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary wikipedia article

If you feel that they need to be merged, by all means go ahead. I had plans to expand the three small articles but have never got around to the task. My only request would be redirect the smaller articles, and not delete them. That would keep it easier to recreate when enough material to expand them is gathered. Also, the structure of mother article for Sunderbans is not too comfortable yet. See how you can accommodate the smaller articles. Another area concern is the existence of 4 different protected reserves in the Sunderbans - 1 in India and 3 in Bangladesh. While the Indian reserve has a large enough article (repeating much of the mother article), the Bangladeshi articles are pretty underdeveloped. I think all 4 articles need non-preferential treatment. While the size of the article is a development issue, the existence of the articles are more of a structural issue. My experience tells me that existence of an individual article prompts more article development than anything else. Aditya(talkcontribs) 06:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Club Quarter(s)

Looking at Club Quarters, I agree it does need a substantial rewrite. When writing this article, I was a fairly new editor and never had the time to go back to edit this appropriately. While I don't think the article deserves to be deleted, as it is a business along the lines of Marriott Hotels & Resorts, and it does need some substantial work. Thank you for being kind enough to bring it to my attention, but I currently have little time to give this article the attention it deserves. --Hourick (talk) 14:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]