User talk:This is Paul: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 29 April 2013: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0512 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0512 --> |
||
== Inconsistency and partiality in editing == |
|||
Oh, well do you not think it would be appropriate that you try and ensure that that policy is applied universally on Wikipedia, and not just in certain instances? Seems a bit odd. Also, with no mention of a building number etc. then a street name hardly constitutes an address. |
|||
Regarding the oil pedantry, why do you delete Scotland yet again, but those 23 other places remain? Are you also stating that you'll also remove those places this very moment too (if you have not already done so), but if they vote for independence, and get to take over responsibility for oil located in their territory, then we can think again? If not, why not? Why the inconsistency yet again? What is your beef here? |
|||
Revision as of 12:16, 2 May 2013
| This is This is Paul's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
|
/Archive1 - April-October 2008 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Nomination
Paul, I left a message for you on my talk page. Anne (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, im so sorry for not responding until now. I have been abroad and not been able to edit during this time Paul. Thanks for helping with the Helen McCourt article anyway. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Nice to see that the article finally made it to DYK :)--BabbaQ (talk) 11:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed. Excellent news. :) Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Nice to see that the article finally made it to DYK :)--BabbaQ (talk) 11:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Paul, I'm beginning the copy-edit to the above article that you requested at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Fantastic. Looks good so far. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Paul; it's Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Good luck with your FA nom, though I recommend that you seek a peer review before nominating. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks like an excellent job as usual. I have an article on peer review at prevent, but will put this forward when that expires. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Paul; it's Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Good luck with your FA nom, though I recommend that you seek a peer review before nominating. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Murder of Helen McCourt
 | On 28 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Murder of Helen McCourt, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the murder of Helen McCourt was the first case in which a suspect was convicted on DNA evidence in the UK without the victim's body having been discovered? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Helen McCourt. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Re: Nick Grimshaw
Are you 100% sure that he is gay? 79.97.153.17 (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Inconsistency and partiality in editing
Oh, well do you not think it would be appropriate that you try and ensure that that policy is applied universally on Wikipedia, and not just in certain instances? Seems a bit odd. Also, with no mention of a building number etc. then a street name hardly constitutes an address.
Regarding the oil pedantry, why do you delete Scotland yet again, but those 23 other places remain? Are you also stating that you'll also remove those places this very moment too (if you have not already done so), but if they vote for independence, and get to take over responsibility for oil located in their territory, then we can think again? If not, why not? Why the inconsistency yet again? What is your beef here?