Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Green Egg: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep'''. It's notable; cursory search for sources turns up eg. [http://www.dallasnews.com/lifestyles/headlines/20100831-Big-Green-Egg-Odd-ceramic-6604.ece], [http://www.mlive.com/food/index.ssf/2009/06/big_green_egg_ceramic_cookers.html], [http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2011/04/29/big-green-egg-hatches-new-ad-campaign.html], [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/13/dining/the-cult-of-the-big-green-egg-united-tastes.html?_r=0], and many more. Being promotional in tone isn't a reason for deletion. [[User:DoctorKubla|DoctorKubla]] ([[User talk:DoctorKubla|talk]]) 06:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. It's notable; cursory search for sources turns up eg. [http://www.dallasnews.com/lifestyles/headlines/20100831-Big-Green-Egg-Odd-ceramic-6604.ece], [http://www.mlive.com/food/index.ssf/2009/06/big_green_egg_ceramic_cookers.html], [http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2011/04/29/big-green-egg-hatches-new-ad-campaign.html], [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/13/dining/the-cult-of-the-big-green-egg-united-tastes.html?_r=0], and many more. Being promotional in tone isn't a reason for deletion. [[User:DoctorKubla|DoctorKubla]] ([[User talk:DoctorKubla|talk]]) 06:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per DoctorKubla. If it's written like an advert, then it just needs rewriting, not deletion. |
*'''Keep''' per DoctorKubla. If it's written like an advert, then it just needs rewriting, not deletion. [[User:Cream147|Cream147]] <sub>[[User Talk:Cream147|Shout at me]]</sub> 15:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:34, 11 May 2013
- The Big Green Egg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement Hotbioform (talk) 03:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Creating deletion discussion for The Big Green Egg
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. It's notable; cursory search for sources turns up eg. [1], [2], [3], [4], and many more. Being promotional in tone isn't a reason for deletion. DoctorKubla (talk) 06:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per DoctorKubla. If it's written like an advert, then it just needs rewriting, not deletion. Cream147 Shout at me 15:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)