User talk:czar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
I am a crowdfunded independent scholar. I maintain editorial independence and reject payments for advocacy. You too can support my work here
Smithsonian sun logo
I am a visiting fellow with the Smithsonian National Museum of African Art. They provide sources and I write articles. Leave a note if you'd like updates.
Emoji u1f419.svgVitam impendere vero.pngEmoji u1f486.svg
Space flower.jpg


Noting your comment on the Wikipedia Library: "Working on a project with mid-20th century British alternative schools". It is certainly an area that is lacking in persisting material, but I am thinking that a serious rummage in my attic may retrieve material on White Lion St and Barrowfield in particular, if these are within your area of interest? AllyD (talk) 08:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

@AllyD, that would be great! Would you have secondary sources? czar 04:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
@AllyD, ping czar 15:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm keeping your interests in mind for my next venture into the attic! Meantime, I noticed an online archive of Undercurrents magazine and pages 33-37 of issue 36 may be of interest. Also a short mainstream press piece on Barrowfield Community School: [1].AllyD (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


Hello. I'm confused. What's the issue with File:Poppybud.jpg ? The talk page has been deleted, so I have no idea. Looks like some kind of licensing issue? Thanks! --Jp07 (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@Jp07, the discussion was at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_August_10#File:Poppybud.jpg. The double license issue was resolved and the image was transferred to Commons, where it can be used across all language Wikipedias. czar 19:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge[edit]

Hello. I've revamped the contest page into this, based on the new British model. Long term goal, but I've added entries since the beginning of July to give it some initial life. Please add anything you've done then this then too! I hope it proves productive long term. The contests are still planned, but will be more tools towards increasing bulk output in overall goal. It's a permanent goal now, and open! I would be grateful if you could keep a record of all your articles you do there, as I really think seeing the combined efforts will encourage others to create more content too! Please spread the word to the others, cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of game-based marketing[edit]

Please note the differnce between the terms 'advertising' and 'marketing'. Advertising stands for promotion and Marketing stands includes everything including 'promotion, selling etc.,'. That is the main point of difference which is not noted in In-game advertising and Advertising in video games. Let me know if you have any issues... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsnarendran14 (talkcontribs) 15:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Since you posted this in two places, see my reply at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game-based marketing czar 16:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Just a friendly reminder[edit]

Hello! Just wanted to remind you about the few questions I asked you at . Thanks for your help! --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


Can you merge Activision Blizzard Studios (company) over Activision Blizzard Studios? No comment on notability, just not created appropriately. -- ferret (talk) 23:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret, ✓ done czar 01:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Xbox One system software[edit]

Hello Czar,

I have noticed that the problem with the changelog that we had last year on the Xbox One system software page is starting to creep back in. I have posted numerous warnings on the talk page, but this has been falling on deaf ears. I wonder if we can protect the article somehow by banning users or IPs who are the offenders? Wagnerp16 (talk) 13:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Wagnerp16 · Well color me unsurprised. Wasn't there a basic consensus to remove the changelogs? If so and the issue is enforcing that, I can help. If not, it needs a talk page consensus. Page protection is only for when editors are going out of process (ignoring talk page consensus, being disruptive). czar 15:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
@Czar If you can help me, then that would be great! The users involved are accusing us of vandalism, even though point four of clearly states Exhaustive logs of software updates. Use reliable third-party (not self-published or official) sources in articles dealing with software updates to describe the versions listed or discussed in the article. Common sense must be applied with regard to the level of detail to be included.. You can have a look at my talk page to find out what one user has said. Wagnerp16 (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
I put a notice at WT:VG for some outside attention. I agree with you on the indiscriminate list interpretation. Bringing in outside editors usually helps stalemated discussions. czar 04:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for that, I don't know if you have seen the article, but it seems that some users clearly don't read these guidelines. I have tried pointing these users to the discussion that we had last year, but they don't seem to read it. I know that one user has given up on enforcing this because they were 'shouted down'. We don't have the same issue with the PS4 system software article. My argument is why do we need duplicate information, when I posted the link to Microsoft's official changelogs in the footnote of the article for reference? Wagnerp16 (talk) 09:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
@Wagnerp16, I agree. WT:VG is a good place to go to bring experienced users to a discussion. Just give a few objective details (explain the dispute) and editors will come. Much better than going back and forth czar 17:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
@Czar, I have posted a comment on WT:VG hopefully someone will pick it up. I won't do any changes to the Xbox One system software for the time being, as this would only aggravate the situation. Wagnerp16 (talk) 09:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

American Assassin (film)[edit]

Hello Czar! It's been long, how are you? Please take a look at Draft:American Assassin (film) and I need you to merge it into American Assassin (film), and I'll do the rest of improvements after merging. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 08:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Assassin!, ✓ done czar 15:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

El Ain, Lebanon[edit]

Redirect ? Xx236 (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

@Xx236, ✓ done but a little more detail would have helped jog my memory czar 15:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

My first FAN[edit]

About a week ago, I nominated Allen Walker to FA (first FAN) in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Allen Walker/archive1 once a fellow user from the guild of copy-editors cleaned up the prose and a second peer review helped me fix some issues. I got two supports and image reviews after editing what issues they found. However, for some reasons the review became inactive. I'd rather the review fails due to other issues rather than inactivity so I would appreciate if you share your thoughts on the article's review. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2, don't have time for a full review at the moment but if I can help with anything small, let me know czar 20:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Get me more reviewers? ...Sorry, just kidding. I already bothered too many people with getting feedback to the review. There is something I'm concerned though. I tried adding alt texts to the two images from the article's body: the sketches and the cosplayer. However, their text is not showing up. Did I mess up something or my computer is too old (Windows XP...)? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tintor2, write them as "alt" instead of "Alt"—they're working now. I'd expand the alts, though (and add one to the infobox image). Alts are designed for the visually impaired so they should describe in a relative amount of detail what you'd want readers to see in the photo (features, context, etc.) czar 03:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Expanded alts. Thanks, I hope get more reviewers. Do you think I should ask for help in the video games project? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Totally not stalking. I could provide a review, in exchange for a source review for the Zero Escape: Virtue's Last Reward FAC. Been trying to drum up attention, but it seems that no one is interested. Famous Hobo (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
(That's the way to do it!) Your first few noms of anything will always take a significant effort to get up to code (and you'll learn and the rest will be easier) but, accordingly, these reviewers have a greater burden than reviewers of your later work as they need to address structural issues rather than small fixes and grammar. I'd try a Wikipedia:FAC mentor who has interest in the topic area before leaving blanket messages. I find that the latter reaps little reward unless there is a sense that previous attempts have been successful. Reviewing each other's work is also a good idea, but the reviews should be independent and rigorous, not quid pro quo to pass each other without substance. The FAC closers usually discount reviews from editors who have not shown either a history or current evidence of close reading. czar 18:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Jumanji (2017 film)[edit]

Hello Czar! Please move Draft:Jumanji (2017 film)Jumanji (2017 film) — Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 17:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Assassin!, ✓ done czar 20:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Marcel Saucet[edit]

Hello there, This unpatrolled, newly created article was deleted by you some two years back. Here is the deletion discussion. Can you check whether this article qualifies for G4. Thanks Hitro talk 18:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

@HitroMilanese, the content is substantively different (not G4) but it's still a trainwreck and guaranteed COI. If it gets deleted again, let me know and I'll salt it czar 20:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Wonder (film)[edit]

Hello Czar! Please do a histmerge of Draft:Wonder (film)Wonder (film) — Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 13:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Assassin!, ✓ done czar 15:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, Czar. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

I Kill Giants (film)[edit]

Hello Czar! Please move Draft:I Kill Giants (film)I Kill Giants (film) — Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 11:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Assassin!, ✓ done czar 20:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Mute (upcoming film)[edit]

Hey Czar. Can you move Draft:Mute (upcoming film)Mute (upcoming film)  ? Thanks!! Tammydemo 13:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Tammydemo, ✓ done czar 20:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

WM NYC Header[edit]

I reverted the change you made to the WM NYC Header because the Header something that needs to be vetted and discussed by the WM NYC Board. Although it is on the Wikipedia mainspace, this is a critical element of how we deliver information to the Wikipedians who participate in our events. Making a significant change like this without our whole Board having a chance to evaluate impact and discuss it is an over-step. If no one took the time to bring this up on the Talk page discussion, I am sorry about that. But wanted to let you know this is a big deal and needs to be done with more consensus. The Header has too much importance for the chapter to have it changed like this. -- Erika, WM NYC Secretary and Board Member, aka BrillLyle (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey @Czar: -- Right now the template you built is appearing on over 100 of our pages and I am not seeing where the redirect from Template:Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Main to your template is happening. Some of these are admin pages so it's important that the header is up to date. Beside which any sort of global change like this as I said above needs to be discussed by the whole WM NYC Board. I appreciate your efforts here but I am one of the stakeholders who works with and maintains this data and implementation was done without any notification. Can you ping me ASAP so this can get fixed? I really appreciate it. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Nevermind, I fixed the template recurring all over our historical pages issue. Probably not the most elegant solution, and I am sorry that this didn't work out but it was really important that the current and past event pages aren't affected like this. Thanks. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Hi @BrillLyle, I responded at Wikipedia_talk:Meetup/NYC#Seeking_ideas_to_redesign_Wikipedia:Meetup.2FNYC.2FHeader.21 and I think we should centralize discussion there. I think it's fine for the NYC board to weigh in on the design however they want, but I'd just like to clarify that for the actual decisions, the community norm is to build consensus on-wiki in a public place. It usually goes without saying that it's against WP spirit to have external, private discussions and vetoes/overrides—ultimately all decisions affecting wiki and project content are made on-wiki by individual editors, board members or not. (I think it's fine to take more time to discuss but let it be open.) Until then, I edited the draft template to reflect that it isn't updated with the latest info. Since I believe you reverted back to the previous version, it isn't on display anywhere and I doubt it has any potential to confuse anyone. czar 17:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Czar,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:FEZ trial gameplay HD.webm is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on October 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-10-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Death Wish (upcoming film)[edit]

Hello Czar! I did not notice that someone has already created Death Wish (upcoming film) until now, so please do a histmerge of Draft:Death Wish (upcoming film)Death Wish (upcoming film) — And I will do the updates later, because filming has just begun a week ago. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 12:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Assassin!, ✓ did this a day or two ago czar 09:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Cup-o-coffee-simple.svg Thanks for your proposal to the WM NYC event board. It seems like you made a sincere attempt to suggest positive changes. Soon people who organize meetups there will discuss what you suggested. I appreciate the time and thoughtfulness that you gave to our meetup in designing this very useful header. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Bluerasberry: -- where exactly is this discussion happening? I would like to be involved in a discussion -- and I think the rest of the Board should be as well. -- Erika, Secretary, WMNYC aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

BrillLyle I posted it on the list of proposed topics for upcoming board meetings. Can you help me by also posting it wherever else you would expect to see this topic raised? I had imagined that this list was the best place but perhaps you have more ideas. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks, @Bluerasberry. Sunk a few hours into it and hope it can be useful. And I replied on the main meetup page, but I hope whatever the board discusses comes back for on-wiki consensus rather than vice versa. Perhaps I'll see both of you at a future event? Just moved back to NY. czar 17:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Oooh. @Czar: -- This is great news that you are in NYC now. Please definitely come to the next meetups, etc. whenever you have time. WM NYC would be lucky to have you! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/ReCore/archive1[edit]

I requested your article to be peer reviewed before I nominate it for GA status. If you have time, I'd appreciate your contribution. Cognissonance (talk) 23:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

@Cognissonance, looks like some nice work has been done on this article but I won't be able to peer review for a while. You could try asking at WT:VG czar 19:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


Hi Czar -- could you move Draft:Suburbicon to Suburbicon now that filming has started? Thanks! NathanielTheBold (talk) 01:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

@NathanielTheBold, ✓ done czar 07:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Meg (film)[edit]

Hey once again! Can you move Draft:Meg (film) to Meg (film) for me? :) Thanks! Tammydemo 19:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tammydemo, ✓ done czar 00:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2016[edit]

This month in GLAM logo.png


Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 15:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Sun October 16: CommonsLab / Open House NY Photo Contest + Hackathon[edit]

Sunday October 16, 2pm: CommonsLab / Open House NY Photo Contest + Hackathon
Wikimedia New York City logo.svg
Statue-of-liberty tysto.jpg

On Sunday, October 16, Wikimedia NYC will host a multimedia tutorial, workshop, and hackathon focused on Wikimedia Commons and the work processes for cultural multimedia wiki-projects.

The CommonsLab is the concluding "upload party" to the Wikipedia @ Open House New York Weekend photo scavenger hunt, and an accompanying Wikimedia Commons multimedia hackathon.

The event will take the form of a modified unconference, with sessions for photographers/creatives, editors/writers and hackers/software folks!

2:00pm - 8:00 pm at NYU ITP, Tisch School of Arts, 721 Broadway, 4th Floor

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

And RSVP now for our next event after this, focusing on Latin American art and artists:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Draft review?[edit]

Would you be kind enough to review User:Ferret/sandbox/Turbulenz‎ let me know if you see any major sourcing issues? I am fairly certain it is good to go (Decent sourcing, not a ton to say, but relatively complete), but with a prior (5 years ago) AFD, I'd like a second opinion first. I believe the original article was for the engine specifically, while I've written this geared more towards the company as a whole. -- ferret (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret, sourcing looks good—nice work! I'd add paragraphs about the two games within the article rather than splitting them out just yet. The dev itself as a topic looks weak for significant coverage (mostly coming from same source) but together with articles about the engine and the two games, won't be contested czar 16:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes I plan to set some redirects and work on expanding history as I dig deeper. I think one reason the topic has been hard to find is they release stuff under a team name, Wonderstruck. But it's all copyrighted back to Turbulenz. -- ferret (talk) 16:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Dan Jeannotte[edit]

Hi could you explain why you deleted the stub about the Canadian actor Dan Jeannotte. I know it could use some more referencing, but couldn't you have just put a label on saying it needed more references without deleting the entire article?

Hi @Kingstoken, I left a detailed edit summary that explains the redirect and the notability guidelines. If you have reliable sources, feel free to add them, but the article would have gone up for deletion if it wasn't used for a redirect. Reliable sources are the most important part of creating new articles as they create the case for the topic's notability czar 20:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary[edit]

A year ago ...
Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
video game
and education
... you were recipient
no. 1311 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Gerald's Game (film)[edit]

Hello Czar! Please move Draft:Gerald's Game (film)Gerald's Game (film) — Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 12:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Assassin!, ✓ done czar 16:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Saturday October 22: WikiArte Latin American Edit-a-thon @ MoMA[edit]

Saturday October 22, 10am: WikiArte Latin American Edit-a-thon @ MoMA
Wikimedia New York City logo.svg

Join us for a full Saturday of social Wikipedia editing at the Museum of Modern Art (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles pertaining to the lives and works of Latin American artists.

The WikiArte (Wiki Arte y Cultura Latinoamerica) edit-a-thon is a global campaign to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Latin American arts and culture and to counter geocultural systemic bias on Wikipedia.

Featuring an opening Artists' Panel at 10am, with Sol Aramendi, Sharon Lee De La Cruz, and Marisa Morán Jahn, to be moderated by Rocío Aranda-Alvarado, curator at El Museo del Barrio.

The Museum of Modern Art and Fundacion Cisneros/Colección Patricia Phelps de Cisneros are uniting with international allies to focus on the lives and works of Latin American artists, architects and designers. With keystone events scheduled for October 22 in New York City and other cities throughout the month (Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Caracas, & others), the campaign aims to further similar goals to Art+Feminism.

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Wikipedia editing experience required. Introductory training on the basics of Wikipedia editing will be given throughout the edit-a-thon. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of suggested topics on hand.

10:00am - 6:00pm at The Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at MoMA, 4 West 54th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenue)
Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Deathmatch Classic[edit]

Do you mind if I prefer deferring the merge to AfD, that often can bring better sourcing and more editor participation. The term "deathmatch classic" often refers to a mode in FPS so it can be difficult finding sources for the mod "Deathmatch Classic" when the term is so generic. I am certain reviews for a mod purchased by over 10 million people exists. Valoem talk contrib 08:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I do if only because three experienced editors besides me have plainly explained on the talk page why you have no case. If you want a greater audience, take it to WT:VG but AfD is not for a single editor's disagreement over the basic notability criteria. Consensus is designed to happen at the talk page, and if you are certain reviews exist, you don't need an AfD to wait to find them. I don't understand the point either—everything we can reasonably source on the subject is already at the redirection target, so if there were to be a standalone page, we'd have quite literally zero additional sourced content to add to the stub... That's what standalone notability is all about. Also you repeat this claim of 10 million purchases but I don't see your evidence. The best you've presented is that the mod was included for free for all purchasers of the main game. So if you're extrapolating based off of inventory counts (original research), we're not talking about evidence that a single person "purchased" it by any means, nevertheless played it, nevertheless any indicator of popularity. czar 19:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Restoring an article[edit]

Howdy Czar. Would you restore Denis Malgin article, now that the fellow is playing in the NHL? :) GoodDay (talk) 14:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

@GoodDay, looks legit—✓ done czar 15:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

So how to proceed on this?[edit]

Hi. We haven't had to opportunity to work together before (to my imperfect memory), so just to state the obvious: all this is just business, nothing personal.

Regarding your statement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hidden Curriculum "I'll note that I've personally deleted and redirected a great many such articles (on that topic) with far more 'coverage' if the above is what passes for significant coverage with this audience"

My take on the question is that of course the article in question meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK (our basic guidelines for book notability). So naturally I'm a little worried that good articles are being deleted by misunderstanding! So some questions:

  1. Is what you said true? Maybe you were just puffing up a little bit? This happens in the course of hammer-and-tongs arguments, and it's perfectly understandable.
  2. If it is true, by "deleted" do you mean you are just flat-out going around deleting articles you don't like?
  3. Or are you approaching AfD discussions with the intent of closing them to delete articles like this?
  4. Or are you just erasing the contents of articles like this, and recasting them as redirects, without discussion and consensus?
  5. Or what?

If it's #1, OK. But if it's one of the other numbers, sounds like there's work to be done! We need to work together to see how to fix this. A list of articles that you have, ah, taken care of in this way would be a good start. Do you keep something like this? Herostratus (talk) 23:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your concern, but it reads no different from condescension. I struggle to understand how those charges could possibly follow from that sentence without a supreme lack of good faith. If you want to review my edits, you know that they are public. If you have a specific issue with my edits, I'm happy to discuss them individually or as a specific group. But with sloppy charges like "just going around deleting articles I don't like", you already knew your answer before you posted and I can hardly think of a more offensive way to write off a Wikipedian's labor and taste. czar 01:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)