Jump to content

User talk:81.132.46.110: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 29: Line 29:


:Please be aware that it is not only images that are copyrighted, plain text is as well. You can't copypaste text from one Wikipedia article to another without proper attribution as it is copyrighted. ---[[User:Saddhiyama|Saddhiyama]] ([[User talk:Saddhiyama|talk]]) 22:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
:Please be aware that it is not only images that are copyrighted, plain text is as well. You can't copypaste text from one Wikipedia article to another without proper attribution as it is copyrighted. ---[[User:Saddhiyama|Saddhiyama]] ([[User talk:Saddhiyama|talk]]) 22:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

::Text is not copyrighted in Wikipedia: I as an author have given all rights to Wikipedia, so copypasting is quite proper. [[Special:Contributions/81.132.46.110|81.132.46.110]] ([[User talk:81.132.46.110#top|talk]]) 07:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:52, 1 June 2013

May 2013

Information icon Hello, I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. You added uncited, lengthy text to Waffen-SS which is not needed for the text therein is already linked to the main article on the subject matter if the reader wants to read more; the sections are to give a short overview. It is important to keep the byte size of articles down so they load better overall and people on mobile devices can read them. Also photos should be added with care as so they don't squeeze text, nor add WP:UNDUE to a section. Please see:

When wanting to change or add something important, please check if it is cited first and then if need be, take the matter to the article talk page for discussion. Please see the links above and enjoy editing herein. Thank you, Kierzek (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nuremberg Trials has been reverted.
Your edit here to Nuremberg Trials was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtRDt6uAB0U) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


As per the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle please respond on the talk page of the article instead of engaging in an edit war. Thanks. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have engaged in copyright violations before on Child euthanasia in Nazi Germany. Please do not copypaste materials from other Wikipedia articles, it may sound silly, but actually does constitute a copyright violation and is thus completely unacceptable on Wikipedia. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation if the image is already in the commons...perhaps the law is different in Denmark? Please get your facts right before making silly accusations. 81.132.46.110 (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English language Wikipedia based in Florida, you can be quite sure that I adhere to the copyright laws of Florida when I make any objections on that particular subject. And I am not talking about images, I was referring to the text that you copy pasted from another article. That particular text is copyrighted so you can't copypaste it without any attribute like that. However all copyright aside, I also have objections about you inserting this particular incident in the article with an unsourced claim that that is the most notable. --Saddhiyama (talk) 22:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon Your addition to Book burning has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The imge was not from an external site but from Wikipedia commons. Get your facts right before deleting reasonable content. 81.132.46.110 (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that it is not only images that are copyrighted, plain text is as well. You can't copypaste text from one Wikipedia article to another without proper attribution as it is copyrighted. ---Saddhiyama (talk) 22:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Text is not copyrighted in Wikipedia: I as an author have given all rights to Wikipedia, so copypasting is quite proper. 81.132.46.110 (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]