Jump to content

Talk:Guy Walters: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reviewed rating using AWB (8459)
Article or CV?: new section
Line 41: Line 41:
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 06:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 06:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Article or CV? ==

I can say this is the first time I have read an article and thought it was written by the person it's about. It looks like he's even keeping it up to date "In June 2013, he accepted the position of Lecturer in Modern British History at the New College of the Humanities in London." I mean who would have written that except for the person it's about?

Revision as of 14:07, 24 June 2013

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
WikiProject iconJournalism Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


{{Request edit}}

Untitled

If you find this link useful may you please add it to the article’s external links: Interview with Guy Walters on Nazi hunting Thank you, Anon111 (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Anon111[reply]

 Done Goodvac (talk) 05:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I've added {{coi}} as the article's subject says in this blog post that "I should declare that I write and update this page". 86.7.19.159 (talk) 23:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. It's written straightforwardly and factually. Nothing to clean up. It's mentioned on the talk page. Ty 03:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is neutralish but it is not ideal - I've added {{autobio}} as this is more appropriate. It needs a big clean up to remove all the unsourced material - i.e. starting a PhD, his wife, his kids etc... If sources can be found I'll add them but if not the info should be removed. 86.7.19.159 (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You posted a tag that the article "may not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy". Could you please explain where it doesn't, as it seems OK to me on that front. It's just factual. There's no interpretation, opinion, praise of the subject etc. If you mean it needs sources then {{Verify}} would be more appropriate, with {{fact}} next to specific text that needs a ref. Ty 14:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a clear conflict of interest. The author is writing about himself, by definition there is a coi.Independent and seen to be independent are key qualifiers in determining whether there is a conflict of interest. "there is no interpretation, opinion, praise of the subject etc" and what about something that is missing. Something that is left out either deliberately or by accident. Vouch and Trace. Mr Walters should, however, be applauded for clearly and truthfully stating that he does edit his own page. The libelous drivel that is aimed against him is vandalism which he has a right to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.199.100 (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GWb-w.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:GWb-w.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:GWb-w.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article or CV?

I can say this is the first time I have read an article and thought it was written by the person it's about. It looks like he's even keeping it up to date "In June 2013, he accepted the position of Lecturer in Modern British History at the New College of the Humanities in London." I mean who would have written that except for the person it's about?