Jump to content

User talk:Fact reporter1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:


Hi, I'm concerned that you may be using several accounts to edit the same articles; see {{User|Fact reporter}}, and guidelines at [[WP:MULTIPLE]]. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/76.248.151.159|76.248.151.159]] ([[User talk:76.248.151.159|talk]]) 01:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm concerned that you may be using several accounts to edit the same articles; see {{User|Fact reporter}}, and guidelines at [[WP:MULTIPLE]]. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/76.248.151.159|76.248.151.159]] ([[User talk:76.248.151.159|talk]]) 01:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

*Further, I'm concerned that you have not responded to the above, and reverted the redirect of a marginally significant television personality. I'd suggest you begin to use the talk pages and edit summaries to explain rationale. In the meantime I've restored the redirect-- the references you supplied are either not acceptable or don't mention the subject pf the article, and a Google News search turns up no sources at all. [[Special:Contributions/76.248.151.159|76.248.151.159]] ([[User talk:76.248.151.159|talk]]) 10:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:06, 7 July 2013

Fact reporter1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Fact reporter1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hi, I'm concerned that you may be using several accounts to edit the same articles; see Fact reporter (talk · contribs), and guidelines at WP:MULTIPLE. Thank you, 76.248.151.159 (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Further, I'm concerned that you have not responded to the above, and reverted the redirect of a marginally significant television personality. I'd suggest you begin to use the talk pages and edit summaries to explain rationale. In the meantime I've restored the redirect-- the references you supplied are either not acceptable or don't mention the subject pf the article, and a Google News search turns up no sources at all. 76.248.151.159 (talk) 10:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]