Talk:Vanilla extract: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 50.14.242.99 - "" |
→This wiki entry should be deleted.: new section |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't see why the section is here and don't think it is necessary. [[User:Kobitate94|Kobitate94]] ([[User talk:Kobitate94|talk]]) 19:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC) |
I don't see why the section is here and don't think it is necessary. [[User:Kobitate94|Kobitate94]] ([[User talk:Kobitate94|talk]]) 19:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== This wiki entry should be deleted. == |
|||
The article is about "vanilla extract", but has only a trivial description of extract. It wanders into the topic of "flavoring" and "imitation" (neither of which are "vanilla extract") and then veers totally off-topic, describing rare cases of ppl intoxicated on the 35% ethanol extract. |
|||
This is a MESS! |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/107.10.15.185|107.10.15.185]] ([[User talk:107.10.15.185|talk]]) 07:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:03, 3 September 2013
The aging process should be mentioned. Bourbon barrels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.14.242.99 (talk) 17:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Food and drink Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Intoxication section really necessary?
I don't see why the section is here and don't think it is necessary. Kobitate94 (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
This wiki entry should be deleted.
The article is about "vanilla extract", but has only a trivial description of extract. It wanders into the topic of "flavoring" and "imitation" (neither of which are "vanilla extract") and then veers totally off-topic, describing rare cases of ppl intoxicated on the 35% ethanol extract.
This is a MESS! 107.10.15.185 (talk) 07:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)