Talk:Amy Webb: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::I'd agree with that assessment. I originally put up the notability tag, because if every Digital Media consultant or "Future Thinker" had a page, Wikipedia would have forty thousand resumes. Just graduating Ivy League and starting a business does not rate an article. Likewise, not every author should have a page; there are millions of authors with out-of-print books who don't get a page. If this book has legs after two years, I'd say keep. --[[User:Bridgecross|Bridgecross]] ([[User talk:Bridgecross|talk]]) 16:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC) |
::I'd agree with that assessment. I originally put up the notability tag, because if every Digital Media consultant or "Future Thinker" had a page, Wikipedia would have forty thousand resumes. Just graduating Ivy League and starting a business does not rate an article. Likewise, not every author should have a page; there are millions of authors with out-of-print books who don't get a page. If this book has legs after two years, I'd say keep. --[[User:Bridgecross|Bridgecross]] ([[User talk:Bridgecross|talk]]) 16:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
::*She's gained some coverage so far, but most of it is more about her commenting about how to game the dating website system rather than about her or her book. I'm still somewhat ambivalent about whether it should be kept or not. It's kind of right at the cusp of pass/fail. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 17:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC) |
::*She's gained some coverage so far, but most of it is more about her commenting about how to game the dating website system rather than about her or her book. I'm still somewhat ambivalent about whether it should be kept or not. It's kind of right at the cusp of pass/fail. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 17:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: Incidentally, she's also bugfuck insane. [[Special:Contributions/75.119.90.35|75.119.90.35]] ([[User talk:75.119.90.35|talk]]) 22:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:25, 10 September 2013
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
Notability
I'd been poised to delete this as failing WP:GNG, but Webb has put out a book that seems to just push her past notability guidelines. I'd debated making an article for the book and redirecting there, but the coverage is fairly light so far and this would be best served as a section in this article. If the book gains more publicity with Valentine's Day coming up, we can create a separate article or debate redirecting Webb's article there.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'd agree with that assessment. I originally put up the notability tag, because if every Digital Media consultant or "Future Thinker" had a page, Wikipedia would have forty thousand resumes. Just graduating Ivy League and starting a business does not rate an article. Likewise, not every author should have a page; there are millions of authors with out-of-print books who don't get a page. If this book has legs after two years, I'd say keep. --Bridgecross (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- She's gained some coverage so far, but most of it is more about her commenting about how to game the dating website system rather than about her or her book. I'm still somewhat ambivalent about whether it should be kept or not. It's kind of right at the cusp of pass/fail. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'd agree with that assessment. I originally put up the notability tag, because if every Digital Media consultant or "Future Thinker" had a page, Wikipedia would have forty thousand resumes. Just graduating Ivy League and starting a business does not rate an article. Likewise, not every author should have a page; there are millions of authors with out-of-print books who don't get a page. If this book has legs after two years, I'd say keep. --Bridgecross (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- Incidentally, she's also bugfuck insane. 75.119.90.35 (talk) 22:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)