Talk:Tylopoda: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Dibe.bi.ee (talk | contribs) |
Dibe.bi.ee (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
There are in fact 8 living tylopoda: |
There are in fact 8 living tylopoda: |
||
Bactrian Camel, Dromedary Camel, Wild Camel (Genetically distinct) |
Bactrian Camel, Dromedary Camel, Wild Camel (Genetically distinct), |
||
Llama, Suri Alpaca, Huacaya Alpaca, Guanaco, Vicuña. (All of these are Genetically distinct) |
Llama, Suri Alpaca, Huacaya Alpaca, Guanaco, Vicuña. (All of these are Genetically distinct) |
||
the way it is listed claims that there are only 5 which is not correct. |
the way it is listed claims that there are only 5 which is not correct. |
Revision as of 06:37, 23 September 2013
![]() | Mammals Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Agriculture Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Other than Camels
What about the Alpaca, Llama, Guanaco, etc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.163.52 (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- What about them? Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 03:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Eight (8) living Tylopoda
There are in fact 8 living tylopoda: Bactrian Camel, Dromedary Camel, Wild Camel (Genetically distinct), Llama, Suri Alpaca, Huacaya Alpaca, Guanaco, Vicuña. (All of these are Genetically distinct) the way it is listed claims that there are only 5 which is not correct. Guanaco, Alpaca and Vicuña are all llamas so If you just say camels and do not mention the three typs of camel that exist then it does not make any sense to mention any other type of llama; which you have incomplete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dibe.bi.ee (talk • contribs) 05:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)