Talk:TO-92: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:59, 11 October 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TO-92 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Electronics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ESD is not related to case style.

This article states under heading "Disadvantges", "Many models are easily vulnerable to electrostatic discharge (ESD)."

ESD sensitivity is a function of the circuits inside the case, not the of the case style itself. That sentence should to be removed.

Michael --71.112.12.154 (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seam in packaging

The statement regarding the "seam" in the package is accurate. If you can squint hard enough to read the label printed on the front of the package, the seam is more than visible. 128.171.60.158 (talk) 00:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a seam though - nothing is joined here. It's moulding flash. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

new nomenclature

"Today, the industry prefers the new TO-206 nomenclature for the TO-92 three-leaded enclosure."
A quick search on the net doesn't confirm this (no results that show to92=to206). However, I found some documents and datasheet that indicate that TO-206AA is actually TO-18 metal cylinder case. Eg. http://products.semelab-tt.com/pdf/misc/packages/mil_pack_drawing_to18.pdf Hoemaco (talk) 12:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 The statement regarding the "seam" in the package is accurate. If you can squint hard enough to read the label printed on the front of the package, the seam is more than visible. [[Special:Contributions/128.171.60.158|128.171.60.158]] ([[User talk:128.171.60.158|talk]]) 00:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 : It's not a seam though - nothing is joined here. It's [[moulding flash]]. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 01:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
+== new nomenclature ==
+"Today, the industry prefers the new TO-206 nomenclature for the TO-92 three-leaded enclosure."<br>
+A quick search on the net doesn't confirm this (no results that show to92=to206). However, I found some documents and datasheet
+that indicate that TO-206AA is actually TO-18 metal cylinder case. Eg. http://products.semelab-tt.com/pdf/misc/packages/mil_pack_drawing_to18.pdf
+[[User:Hoemaco|Hoemaco]] ([[User talk:Hoemaco|talk]]) 12:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)