Talk:Development of the Old Testament canon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:06, 14 October 2013

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion: Interfaith B‑class

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Christianity B‑class Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Bible B‑class Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

The case against the Apocrypha is overstated

I have been working Michael Barber's blog entry into this article. However, I am concerned that Barber's position is only one POV and is a minority viewpoint. I wanted to ask others for their opinion regarding this material and how best to present it in an NPOV way. Among other questions, I'm wondering if this material should be presented in this article or in the Deuterocanonical books article.

--Richard 08:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Defining Abbreviations

I think the quote "ascertain whether or not Jesus quoted from the MT or the LXX" should be accompanied by a definition of "MT" and "LXX"

--Acaudel 011:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bryennos List

See here for an interesting discussion of Codex Hierosolymitanus. Rwflammang (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Michael Barber?

Who is Michael Barber and why is he considered a relevant authority on this subject? The whole section titled "Jesus" reads as if it's out of place in this article and assumes the reader knows who Michael Barber is.

Paul Brannan (talk) 12:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Timing of changes to printed Bibles

"However, Anglican and Lutheran Bibles usually still contained these books until the 20th century, while Calvinist Bibles did not."

Did Calvinist Bibles ever contain the deuterocanonical books? If so, when were they first commonly omitted?

When exactly did Anglican and Lutheran Bibles start to omit the deuterocanonicals? Which editions or publishers? When did the practice become commonplace?

99.118.9.187 (talk) 08:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 [[User:Curlypaul924|Paul Brannan]] ([[User talk:Curlypaul924|talk]]) 12:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
+== Timing of changes to printed Bibles ==
+"However, Anglican and Lutheran Bibles usually still contained these books until the 20th century, while Calvinist Bibles did not."
+Did Calvinist Bibles ever contain the deuterocanonical books? If so, when were they first commonly omitted?
+When exactly did Anglican and Lutheran Bibles start to omit the deuterocanonicals? Which editions or publishers? When did the practice become commonplace?
+[[Special:Contributions/99.118.9.187|99.118.9.187]] ([[User talk:99.118.9.187|talk]]) 08:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC)