Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Lilov: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:30, 16 October 2013

Tiger Lilov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely non-notable, no significant accomplishments, no coverage in mainstream media. The subject is the same as Valeri Lilov, whose article has been AFD'ed twice now, and is protected from re-creation. It is clear that Lilov is a publicity hound that views Wikipedia as his own personal facebook. Delete, not notable, vanity page. Speiss67 (talk) 20:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, International Master not sufficient notability in itself. --Soman (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete

was deleted before, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeri Lilov (2nd nomination).
Usually a player needs to be a grandmaster to have an article and he has the lower title of international master
here is his FIDE page. His rating has been flat for a couple of years, showing that he hasn't improved since the article was deleted the last time. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 02:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but edit. Many International Masters have wiki pages, so do some players with no FIDE title at all who are more notable as chess coaches or authors than as players (e.g. Dan Heisman). People find his penchant for self-publicity annoying, I understand that, but provided his page is edited so that it doesn't read like an ad, I don't see why he shouldn't have a page. MaxBrowne (talk) 05:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The problem here is if you actually take a look at the "wall of sources" you notice it's all self promotion, or meaningless links to internet chess servers. There is not a single reliable source in the bunch. Fishface gurl (talk) 05:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but edit. My suggestion is that the page be kept, however, the content need to be edited to reflect the neutrality expected of Wiki article. I support all the points alluded by MaxBrowne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtweb1 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 04:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bulgaria|list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 04:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Keep but edit'''. Many International Masters have wiki pages, so do some players with no FIDE title at all who are more notable as chess coaches or authors than as players (e.g. [[Dan Heisman]]). People find his penchant for self-publicity annoying, I understand that, but provided his page is edited so that it doesn't read like an ad, I don't see why he shouldn't have a page. [[User:MaxBrowne|MaxBrowne]] ([[User talk:MaxBrowne|talk]]) 05:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
-* '''Keep but edit'''
-Many International Masters have wiki pages, so do some players with no FIDE title at all who are more notable as chess coaches or authors than as players (e.g. [[Dan Heisman]]). People find his penchant for self-publicity annoying, I understand that, but provided his page is edited so that it doesn't read like an ad, I don't see why he shouldn't have a page. [[User:MaxBrowne|MaxBrowne]] ([[User talk:MaxBrowne|talk]]) 05:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 *'''Delete.''' The problem here is if you actually take a look at the "wall of sources" you notice it's all self promotion, or meaningless links to internet chess servers.  There is not a single reliable source in the bunch. [[User:Fishface gurl|Fishface gurl]] ([[User talk:Fishface gurl|talk]]) 05:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
+* '''Keep but edit'''. My suggestion is that the page be kept, however, the content need to be edited to reflect the neutrality expected of Wiki article. I support all the points alluded by [[User:MaxBrowne|MaxBrowne]].  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rtweb1|Rtweb1]] ([[User talk:Rtweb1|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rtweb1|contribs]]) 06:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-* '''Keep but edit'''
-My suggestion is that the page be kept, however, the content need to be edited to reflect the neutrality expected of Wiki article. I support all the points alluded by [[User:MaxBrowne|MaxBrowne]].  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rtweb1|Rtweb1]] ([[User talk:Rtweb1|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rtweb1|contribs]]) 06:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-**<small>{{user|Rtweb1}} has no other edits than this AfD vote. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 07:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)</small>