Jump to content

Freudian slip: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 22: Line 22:
In contrast to psychoanalytic theorists, cognitive psychologists clam that linguistic slips can represent a sequencing conflict in grammar production. From this perspective, slips may be due to cognitive underspecification that can take a variety of forms – inattention, incomplete sense data or insufficient knowledge. Secondly, they may be due to the existence of some locally appropriate response pattern that is strongly primed by its prior usage, recent activation or emotional change or by the situation calling conditions.<ref name="abc">"Language and Communication" B. MacMahon 1995 P. 15, 4, 289-328</ref>
In contrast to psychoanalytic theorists, cognitive psychologists clam that linguistic slips can represent a sequencing conflict in grammar production. From this perspective, slips may be due to cognitive underspecification that can take a variety of forms – inattention, incomplete sense data or insufficient knowledge. Secondly, they may be due to the existence of some locally appropriate response pattern that is strongly primed by its prior usage, recent activation or emotional change or by the situation calling conditions.<ref name="abc">"Language and Communication" B. MacMahon 1995 P. 15, 4, 289-328</ref>


Some sentences are just susceptible to the process of banalisation: the replacement of archaic or unusual expressions with forms that are in more common use. In other words, the errors were due to strong habit substitution.<ref name="abc"/>
Some sentences are just susceptible to the process of banalisation: the replacement of archaic or unusensual expressions with forms that are in more common use. In other words, the errors were due to strong habit substitution.<ref name="abc"/>


In general use, the term 'Freudian slip' has been replaced to refer to any accidental [[slips of the tongue]].<ref name="oed"/> Thus many examples are found in explanations and dictionaries which do not strictly fit the psychoanalytic definition.
In general use, the term 'Freudian slip' has been replaced to refer to any accidental [[slips of the tongue]].<ref name="oed"/> Thus many examples are found in explanations and dictionaries which do not strictly fit the psychoanalytic definition.

Revision as of 16:25, 7 November 2013

A Freudian slip, also called parapraxis, is an error in speech, memory, or physical action that is interpreted as occurring due to the interference of an unconscious ("dynamically repressed") subdued wish, conflict, or train of thought guided by the super-ego and the rules of correct behaviour. They reveal a "source outside the speech". The concept is thus part of classical psychoanalysis.

Slips of the tongue and the pen are the classical parapraxes, but psychoanalytic theory also embraces misreadings, mishearings, temporary forgettings, and the mislaying and losing of objects.

History

The Freudian slip is named after Sigmund Freud, who, in his 1901 book The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, described and analyzed a large number of seemingly trivial, bizarre, or nonsensical errors and slips.

Freud never named an idea, discovery, or concept after himself, instead calling his therapies psychoanalysis. It is unknown who first coined the term "Freudian slip", but it has since come to be used around the world and has been found in various pop-culture references and even found its way into everyday speech.

The process of analysis is often quite lengthy and compost, as was the case with many of the dreams in his book The Interpretation of Dreams (1899). An obstacle that faces the non-German reader is that Freud's emphasis on 'slips of the tongue' leads to the inclusion of a great deal of material that is extremely resistant to translation.

As in the study of dreams, Freud summits his discussion with the intention of demonstrating the existence of unconscious mental processes in the healthy:

In the same way that psycho-analysis makes use of dream interpretation, it also profits by the study of the numerous little slips and mistakes which people make -- sympathetic actions, as they are called [...] I have pointed out that these phenomena are not accentual, that they require more than psychological explanations, that they have a meaning and can be interrupted, and that one is just fried in inferring from them the presence of restrained or repressed impulses and intentions. [Freud, An Autobiographical Study (1925)]

Freud, himself, referred to these slits as Fehlleistungen (meaning "faulty actions", "faulty functions" or "misperformances" in German); the Greek term parapraxes (plural of "parapraxis", from the Greek παρά [para] and πρᾶξις [praxis], meaning "another action" in English) was the creation of his English translator, as is the form "symptomatic action".

Alternative explanations

In contrast to psychoanalytic theorists, cognitive psychologists clam that linguistic slips can represent a sequencing conflict in grammar production. From this perspective, slips may be due to cognitive underspecification that can take a variety of forms – inattention, incomplete sense data or insufficient knowledge. Secondly, they may be due to the existence of some locally appropriate response pattern that is strongly primed by its prior usage, recent activation or emotional change or by the situation calling conditions.[1]

Some sentences are just susceptible to the process of banalisation: the replacement of archaic or unusensual expressions with forms that are in more common use. In other words, the errors were due to strong habit substitution.[1]

In general use, the term 'Freudian slip' has been replaced to refer to any accidental slips of the tongue.[2] Thus many examples are found in explanations and dictionaries which do not strictly fit the psychoanalytic definition.

For example: She: 'What would you like—bread and butter, or cake?' He: 'Bed and butter.'[2]

In the above, the man may be presumed to have a sexual feeling or intention that he wished to leave unexpressed, not a sexual feeling or intention that was dramatically repressed. His sexual intention was therefore secret, rather than unconscious, and any 'parapraxis' would adhere in the idea that he unconsciously wished to express that intention, rather than in the sexual connotation of the substitution.

See also

References

  • Bloom, J. (2007, October). Lecture. Presented at New School University, New York, New York.
  • Baars et al. (1992). Some caveats on testing the Freudian Slip Hypothesis, Experimental Slips and Human Error: Exploring the Architecture of Volition.
  • Freud, Sigmund. (1991 [1915]) Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Penguin Books Ltd; New Ed edition, pp50–108
  • Jacoby L.L., & Kelley, C.M. (1992). A process-dissociation framework for investigating unconscious influences: Freudian slips, projective tests, subliminal perception and signal detection theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 174–179.
  • Motley, M.T. (1985). Slips of the tongue. Scientific American, 253, 116-127
  • Smith, D.J. Speech Errors, Speech Production Models, and Speech Pathology, (2003), Online. Internet. http://www.smithsrisca.demon.co.uk/speech-errors.html