Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gascoigne Leather Furniture: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:40, 11 November 2013

Gascoigne Leather Furniture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed by creator without addressing the issues. Concern was: recreation of a previously deleted article. Although this makes claims to importance, no independent 3rd party sources have been suppled that assert notability per WP:ORG. Notability is not inherited from notable customers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I didn't notice any qualifying sources on my first run-through when the article was created, but now I found two, in the New Zealand Herald and the Melville Times. Is two a sufficient number? Yes, having famous people among your customers doesn't confer notability. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the Melville times is local coverage and looks a bit advertorial, it even gives the company's phone number. LibStar (talk) 23:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How many more references are needed for it to be considered notable?Lucy4962 (talk) 03:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 03:39, 11 November 2013 edit Lucy4962 (talk \| contribs) 8 edits →Gascoigne Leather Furniture ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:40, 11 November 2013 edit undo Lucy4962 (talk \| contribs) 8 edits →Gascoigne Leather Furniture Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:the Melville times is local coverage and looks a bit advertorial, it even gives the company's phone number. [[User:LibStar\|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar\|talk]]) 23:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)		:the Melville times is local coverage and looks a bit advertorial, it even gives the company's phone number. [[User:LibStar\|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar\|talk]]) 23:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

	How many more references are needed for it to be considered notable?		How many more references are needed for it to be considered notable?[[User:Lucy4962\|Lucy4962]] ([[User talk:Lucy4962\|talk]]) 03:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)