User talk:Dave Dial

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2
Archive 3	Archive 4
Archive 5	Archive 6- The Beginning

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Anarcham (talk) 21:12, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Problem with another editor

I appeciate what you did and I have problems with User:75.90.232.5 and User:75.146.15.253, who have made the same inappropriate edits to Freestyle Music Park. I have asked for oversight of my user page.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Yea, I saw the edit on that article and was in the process of reverting that too, but you beat me to it. It's difficult to steer editors who have no desire to follow Wiki guidelines into the right direction. Especially when they make edits like the soon to be oversighted one. Good luck! Dave Dial (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I didn't want to get into a 3RR situation. I haven't seen what the person did because I don't have sound on my computer and my Internet is too slow to watch videos anyway. It could have been valid journalism and appropriate for the article, except the person was obviously promoting himself. Then he goes and accuses me in an edit summary of promoting myself. I have no connection to this park beyond the fact I used to enjoy shopping in the mall that became its offices, much less a fictional story about it, but I seem to have become the self-appointed protector of the article.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Well, YouTube is not a reliable source anyway. Plus, the video seems as if it's some kind of poorly made satire. In any case, it does not belong in the article. Dave Dial (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your statement should be on the talk page then. I decided to give the person the benefit of the doubt for the content of the source rather than the edit itself.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

talk page

Please stop deleting my talk page edits. They are civil, and belong out in public to gain information if an SPI is warranted. I am neither going to keep silent, file an SPI immaturely, or conduct a back-of-the scenes investigation, which are the alternatives you would leave me. There is no intimidation, I am not telling H not to edit. If you continue to delete my comments I'll file a report for WP:3RR and talk page violation. μηδείς (talk) 01:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Sigh....You do not have those options. If you feel filing an SPI is immature, you should know that making the accusations on an article Talk page with no evidence is even more immature. Goof. Dave Dial (talk) 03:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Selective enforcement

Did you know that earlier this month Pass3456 changed my New Deal talk page comments, removing a new section and scattering its contents? That's what caused the problem you complained about when you reverted my later edit. If you had been consistent in enforcement, the whole problem never would have occurred and my edits wouldn't have been lost.

The New Deal article has some conspicuous original research waiting for you to remove them.

There is also a fringe theory if you check Supreme Court jurisprudence on constitutional rights. LesLein (talk) 01:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

My account

I am using this account for school project, so please don't indef block it. Ef alt (talk) 16:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)