Talk:Nazi views on Catholicism: Difference between revisions
→Orphaned references in Nazi views on Catholicism: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 11:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC) |
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 11:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Sourcing== |
|||
While this article has several sources, they are cited fairly...heavily, and frankly suspiciously. Britannica's got 5 references, Conway's got 7, Alan Bullock's got 5, and there are 3 references to "Krieg," though there's no explanation of who Krieg is or what the title of his work is. That, to me, reeks of stealing sources from other sources. Likewise, Gill is cited several times, but the source of the citations is only given on ''last'' reference, which makes little sense unless the quotes are cribbed from a source which has them in a different order. I'd suggest somebody investigate, because Wikipedia's not about cribbing somebody else's work. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/24.124.99.189|24.124.99.189]] ([[User talk:24.124.99.189|talk]]) 11:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:59, 23 November 2013
Christianity: Catholicism Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Germany Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Orphaned references in Nazi views on Catholicism
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Nazi views on Catholicism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Honourable Defeat p.60":
- From Catholic Church and Nazi Germany: Gill, 1994, p.60
- From Catholic resistance to Nazi Germany: Anton Gill; An Honourable Defeat; A History of the German Resistance to Hitler; Heinemann; London; 1994; p.60
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Sourcing
While this article has several sources, they are cited fairly...heavily, and frankly suspiciously. Britannica's got 5 references, Conway's got 7, Alan Bullock's got 5, and there are 3 references to "Krieg," though there's no explanation of who Krieg is or what the title of his work is. That, to me, reeks of stealing sources from other sources. Likewise, Gill is cited several times, but the source of the citations is only given on last reference, which makes little sense unless the quotes are cribbed from a source which has them in a different order. I'd suggest somebody investigate, because Wikipedia's not about cribbing somebody else's work. 24.124.99.189 (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)