Jump to content

Talk:Nazi views on Catholicism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 11:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 11:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

==Sourcing==

While this article has several sources, they are cited fairly...heavily, and frankly suspiciously. Britannica's got 5 references, Conway's got 7, Alan Bullock's got 5, and there are 3 references to "Krieg," though there's no explanation of who Krieg is or what the title of his work is. That, to me, reeks of stealing sources from other sources. Likewise, Gill is cited several times, but the source of the citations is only given on ''last'' reference, which makes little sense unless the quotes are cribbed from a source which has them in a different order. I'd suggest somebody investigate, because Wikipedia's not about cribbing somebody else's work.
[[Special:Contributions/24.124.99.189|24.124.99.189]] ([[User talk:24.124.99.189|talk]]) 11:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:59, 23 November 2013

WikiProject iconChristianity: Catholicism Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism.
WikiProject iconGermany Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in Nazi views on Catholicism

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Nazi views on Catholicism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Honourable Defeat p.60":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 11:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

While this article has several sources, they are cited fairly...heavily, and frankly suspiciously. Britannica's got 5 references, Conway's got 7, Alan Bullock's got 5, and there are 3 references to "Krieg," though there's no explanation of who Krieg is or what the title of his work is. That, to me, reeks of stealing sources from other sources. Likewise, Gill is cited several times, but the source of the citations is only given on last reference, which makes little sense unless the quotes are cribbed from a source which has them in a different order. I'd suggest somebody investigate, because Wikipedia's not about cribbing somebody else's work. 24.124.99.189 (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]