Talk:Base 24: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Adding class, importance & field to maths rating template |
→i was going to write a new section...: new section |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=="quadrovigesimal"== |
=="quadrovigesimal"== |
||
This appears to have relatively little use outside Wikipedia (small number of Google hits), and is not correct Latin, so it would need to be explained why the article should be moved to that title. [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 23:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC) |
This appears to have relatively little use outside Wikipedia (small number of Google hits), and is not correct Latin, so it would need to be explained why the article should be moved to that title. [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 23:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
== i was going to write a new section... == |
|||
i was going to name this page "tetravigesimal?" but i already seen a section on exactly that. |
|||
so i just wrote this |
Revision as of 01:44, 2 January 2014
Mathematics Redirect‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Notability
I suggest the notability issues raised by sligocki are discussed here: Category talk:Positional numeral systems#Notability.--Noe (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
"tetravigesimal"
This would be objected to by some as a hybrid Greek/Latin form, and the Google search tetravigesimal -wikipedia turns up exactly one hit.[1] -- AnonMoos (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
"quadrovigesimal"
This appears to have relatively little use outside Wikipedia (small number of Google hits), and is not correct Latin, so it would need to be explained why the article should be moved to that title. AnonMoos (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
i was going to write a new section...
i was going to name this page "tetravigesimal?" but i already seen a section on exactly that. so i just wrote this