Talk:Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: Difference between revisions
→Signs and symptoms: new section |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
"Naming and classifications prior to Beighton's 2008 nosology, revised in 1997, can be considered obsolete." - This sentence doesn't make sense: Was Beighton's 2008 nosology revised in 1997 (in which case surely it is either Beighton's 1997 nosology, puplished or re-published in 2008), or are all other classifications prior to the 2008 nosology rendered obselete, in which case what is the relevance of the previous revision (if that's what it was)? [[User:Epideme|Epideme]] ([[User talk:Epideme|talk]]) 00:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC) |
"Naming and classifications prior to Beighton's 2008 nosology, revised in 1997, can be considered obsolete." - This sentence doesn't make sense: Was Beighton's 2008 nosology revised in 1997 (in which case surely it is either Beighton's 1997 nosology, puplished or re-published in 2008), or are all other classifications prior to the 2008 nosology rendered obselete, in which case what is the relevance of the previous revision (if that's what it was)? [[User:Epideme|Epideme]] ([[User talk:Epideme|talk]]) 00:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
:In my reading I assumed the intent is to infer that "[...prior to the] 2008 nosology (''which hence supplants the previous edition, which was last'') revised in 1997 (''and is now therefore out of date,'') can be considered obsolete." where the parentheses indicate the translation produced by the brain that lives in my head. Of course, there's a significant amount of theoretically missing information being bridged, but it could just be a case of badly structured text and/or poor choice of words (although still unreferenced) [[Special:Contributions/202.89.189.7|202.89.189.7]] ([[User talk:202.89.189.7|talk]]) 22:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Signs and symptoms == |
== Signs and symptoms == |
Revision as of 22:26, 10 January 2014
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Ehlers–Danlos syndrome.
|
Medicine: Dermatology / Genetics C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Link to contortionism?
I came to this page from an article on a professional contortionist, which mentioned she had this syndrome. It seems that many other contortionists have this syndrome. This seems to be a notable fact worth mentioning in the article. Syndromes do not have to always have a negative impact on life.
RedTomato (talk) 23:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Can I add images?
I have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Can I edit to add images? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.25.118 (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Ambiguity/error
"Naming and classifications prior to Beighton's 2008 nosology, revised in 1997, can be considered obsolete." - This sentence doesn't make sense: Was Beighton's 2008 nosology revised in 1997 (in which case surely it is either Beighton's 1997 nosology, puplished or re-published in 2008), or are all other classifications prior to the 2008 nosology rendered obselete, in which case what is the relevance of the previous revision (if that's what it was)? Epideme (talk) 00:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- In my reading I assumed the intent is to infer that "[...prior to the] 2008 nosology (which hence supplants the previous edition, which was last) revised in 1997 (and is now therefore out of date,) can be considered obsolete." where the parentheses indicate the translation produced by the brain that lives in my head. Of course, there's a significant amount of theoretically missing information being bridged, but it could just be a case of badly structured text and/or poor choice of words (although still unreferenced) 202.89.189.7 (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Signs and symptoms
I have removed a large number of entries from the "Signs and Symptoms" section that were not backed up by references. I am leaving them here for future reference. Anyone who find the references to add any of them back into the article with references should feel free to edit the list to reflect that. Sunrise (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Musculoskeletal:
Skin:
Cardiovascular:
Other manifestations or complications:
|
- C-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- C-Class dermatology articles
- Unknown-importance dermatology articles
- Dermatology task force articles
- C-Class medical genetics articles
- Unknown-importance medical genetics articles
- Medical genetics task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine articles