User talk:93.107.11.99: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:20, 16 February 2014

Guinea pig

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Your recent editing history at Snakes on a Plane shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. George Ho (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Not even three reverts. I restored deleted content that had previously been in the article. Another editor helped improve the wording. Then I made another effort to change the wording as another editor requested, add added more sources to show had gotten significant attention making it more WP:NOTABLE than just another TV dub. Editor said the section needed to be improved but deleted it, can't improve it when it is not included in the article.

Any followup comments should be posted on the article Talk page for others to see. -- 93.107.11.99 (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 19:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 :''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
+: Not even three reverts. I restored deleted content that had previously been in the article. Another editor helped improve the wording. Then I made another effort to change the wording as another editor requested, add added more sources to show had gotten significant attention making it more [[WP:NOTABLE]] than just another TV dub. Editor said the section needed to be improved but deleted it, can't improve it when it is not included in the article.
+: Any followup comments should be posted on the article Talk page for others to see. -- [[Special:Contributions/93.107.11.99|93.107.11.99]] ([[User talk:93.107.11.99#top|talk]]) 20:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)