User talk:FoCuSandLeArN: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
::In any case, they're just article edits that happened to be in your sandbox. I don't see any problems with them being seen. [[User:FoCuSandLeArN|FoCuSandLeArN]] ([[User talk:FoCuSandLeArN#top|talk]]) 17:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC) |
::In any case, they're just article edits that happened to be in your sandbox. I don't see any problems with them being seen. [[User:FoCuSandLeArN|FoCuSandLeArN]] ([[User talk:FoCuSandLeArN#top|talk]]) 17:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
::: It's correct. Just more than one year of diverse works from my sandbox since the beginning of my WP life. Anyway, no problem with them being seen. --[[User:Parsedan|Parsedan]] ([[User talk:Parsedan|talk]]) 18:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC) |
::: It's correct. Just more than one year of diverse works from my sandbox since the beginning of my WP life. Anyway, no problem with them being seen. --[[User:Parsedan|Parsedan]] ([[User talk:Parsedan|talk]]) 18:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
Hi FoCuSandLeArN -<br /> |
|||
<br /> |
|||
I am a new participant with first Wikipedia article pending, so very much appreciate your feedback and help. We think we have a good article submitted, but are new to the whole works including talk discussions like this one. We notice that you left a "comment" concerning our article on climb-and-collapse: "This is a direct copy of this book, although I can't seem to get a hold of it. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)" (The link in your comment accesses a PDF document on the same subject) <br /> |
|||
<br /> |
|||
If your comment contemplates possible matters of copyright, please don't be concerned - I wrote the article accessed by your link, and it (the PDF) is an open-courseware PDF which is intended to be free for educational and non-commercial use. Other possible matters that may be of interest - the linked PDF is not a book and not a "for sale" item in bookstores or online or anywhere else. Instead, it is a short, freely-downloadable and free-for-sharing "executive summary" of the subject matter. The subject matter in our Wikipedia submission is also treated with greater detail and rigor involving references and citations.<br /> |
|||
<br /> |
|||
Hope the above will be useful. <br /> |
|||
<br /> |
|||
[[User:Sustainability1|Sustainability1]] ([[User talk:Sustainability1|talk]]) 10:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
|||
<br /> |
Revision as of 10:46, 9 April 2014
This is FoCuSandLeArN's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34Auto-archiving period: 3 days ![]() |
![]() | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This is my talk page. |
If you wish to ask why an article you submitted was declined, see some general advice here: User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/AFC declines |
If this advice does not answer your questions, then for the fastest response try: |
* AFC Help Desk |
* unofficial live chat |
Or please | to leave me a message.
I always respond on my talkpage unless instructed to do so elsewhere. |
I'd like to know why my topic was deemed non-notable please.
I submitted a page about one of the founders of my field and yet it was determined the topic/person was non-notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerryjoy (talk • contribs) 18:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is unreferenced. You need to establish her notability, and WP:ACADEMIC will be of great help to you. You can't just state "Taylor is recognized as a leading scholar in the fields of environmental sociology" and not provide references. Her own work is insufficient to determine whether she is a leading academic in her respective field. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Article Submission Question
Curious as to why the article I submitted for my beer company (which is a company description) was rejected. Any help would be appreciated. THX Anandc7 (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandc7 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is non-notable, as stated in the submission's comments section. Also read [[WP:COI]}. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Jean-Louis de Boubers
Thank you for Jean-Louis de Boubers. --Parsedan (talk) 08:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Anaerolinea thermophila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chloroflexi
- Caldilinea aerophila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chloroflexi
- Haliangium ochraceum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sessile
- Haliangium tepidum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sessile
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Jean-Louis de Boubers: Revision history
Hello FocusandLearn, Is it possible to remove my oldest contributions from "Jean-Louis de Boubers: Revision history" ([Here]) which are, in fact, the history of my personal sandbox ? There is no direct relationship with the article ? Thank you.--Parsedan (talk) 13:22, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm...let me ping @Technical 13: and see what can be done. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- What you are looking for is "Revision deletion" and requires an administrator willing to perform it, which is extremely rare and you would have to offer a really good reason. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 17:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- In any case, they're just article edits that happened to be in your sandbox. I don't see any problems with them being seen. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's correct. Just more than one year of diverse works from my sandbox since the beginning of my WP life. Anyway, no problem with them being seen. --Parsedan (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- In any case, they're just article edits that happened to be in your sandbox. I don't see any problems with them being seen. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi FoCuSandLeArN -
I am a new participant with first Wikipedia article pending, so very much appreciate your feedback and help. We think we have a good article submitted, but are new to the whole works including talk discussions like this one. We notice that you left a "comment" concerning our article on climb-and-collapse: "This is a direct copy of this book, although I can't seem to get a hold of it. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)" (The link in your comment accesses a PDF document on the same subject)
If your comment contemplates possible matters of copyright, please don't be concerned - I wrote the article accessed by your link, and it (the PDF) is an open-courseware PDF which is intended to be free for educational and non-commercial use. Other possible matters that may be of interest - the linked PDF is not a book and not a "for sale" item in bookstores or online or anywhere else. Instead, it is a short, freely-downloadable and free-for-sharing "executive summary" of the subject matter. The subject matter in our Wikipedia submission is also treated with greater detail and rigor involving references and citations.
Hope the above will be useful.
Sustainability1 (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)