Jump to content

Talk:Chaouacha: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:


Distorting actions and motives in such claims from "your faction" I'm getting used to but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaouacha&diff=603822334&oldid=603819070 this is nonsense]. The redlink was available and there are no other uses for this name, so undabbing it is mandated by guidelines. This move was not POINT; yes I missed the conjugation, it was late at night my time and I was tired; you are the one being POINTy and AGF here.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 05:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Distorting actions and motives in such claims from "your faction" I'm getting used to but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaouacha&diff=603822334&oldid=603819070 this is nonsense]. The redlink was available and there are no other uses for this name, so undabbing it is mandated by guidelines. This move was not POINT; yes I missed the conjugation, it was late at night my time and I was tired; you are the one being POINTy and AGF here.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 05:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
:I faction. I am anti-you when you act like a disruptive and spiteful jerk which you have been doing lately, and I am anti-kwami when his obsession with moving articles around gets disruptive. Both of you are wasting your own and other editors timne when you could be writing content instead of moveing around articles written by other people. And yes you are making a point violation because you know full well that there is a valid norm having articles about ethnic group located at X people, and you also know that there is no requirement for articles to be located at the shortest possible title.you just dont agree with it, and since you failed to get consensus for your opinion over most articles where you have suggested this you are now picking the low haning fruit by moving the articles for which there are no articles about languages yet. Probably in an attempt to make it look as if there is a preference for the shorter but ambiguous title. SO no, there is no "mandate", you are just choosing to make it look like that out of spite and a weird preference for ambiguous titles. I however and not going to waste more time on your crap, I have better things to spend my time on than egotrippers and angry mastodons like you. [[User talk:Maunus|User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw·]] 17:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:02, 12 April 2014

WikiProject iconIndigenous peoples of North America Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Louisiana Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

since when is moving a dabbed article to an available redlink a "Point violation"?

Distorting actions and motives in such claims from "your faction" I'm getting used to but this is nonsense. The redlink was available and there are no other uses for this name, so undabbing it is mandated by guidelines. This move was not POINT; yes I missed the conjugation, it was late at night my time and I was tired; you are the one being POINTy and AGF here.Skookum1 (talk) 05:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I faction. I am anti-you when you act like a disruptive and spiteful jerk which you have been doing lately, and I am anti-kwami when his obsession with moving articles around gets disruptive. Both of you are wasting your own and other editors timne when you could be writing content instead of moveing around articles written by other people. And yes you are making a point violation because you know full well that there is a valid norm having articles about ethnic group located at X people, and you also know that there is no requirement for articles to be located at the shortest possible title.you just dont agree with it, and since you failed to get consensus for your opinion over most articles where you have suggested this you are now picking the low haning fruit by moving the articles for which there are no articles about languages yet. Probably in an attempt to make it look as if there is a preference for the shorter but ambiguous title. SO no, there is no "mandate", you are just choosing to make it look like that out of spite and a weird preference for ambiguous titles. I however and not going to waste more time on your crap, I have better things to spend my time on than egotrippers and angry mastodons like you. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 17:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]