Template talk:Nazism sidebar: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:47, 6 May 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nazism sidebar template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Politics Template‑class Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

which Parteiadler?

which Parteiadler should we use? 115.187.78.250 (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

the sources DIREKTOR provided shows two diffrent versions [1][2] so lets decide which is better 115.187.78.250 (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its an entirely subjective issue... I'd say the current one. Its the same design variant used for the Reichsadler, so, consistency. I think its a generally more common variant in terms of recognizability. Also the more "streamlined" variant seems a bit too short. -- Director (talk) 23:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes its olny a subjective issue it not about whos right but which version people like most so the version 2 is much more elegant and, moreover, is a perfect pendant to the Italian fascio 115.187.78.250 (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the first one is "prettier" and the whitespace is better in line with the size of the image. However, I'm not an expert, but the second one looks more in line with my idea of a Nazi aesthetic. (and thus, to modern anti-Nazi eyes, more "evil".) So if somebody could widen the white lines on #2 a hair, I'd !vote for that; otherwise, #1. Homunq (࿓) 20:25, 20 April 2014 (UTC) ps. Please comment on other RfCs like this one[reply]

Yeah, the current one seems to be a higher-quality image in general. It just looks better imo. -- Director (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From a purely aesthetic point of view I would use the top one. It seems to match well with the sources provided so not seeing an issue with the accuracy. However, I am not knowledgeable on this issue so if there is any doubt on this part then I would go with whatever on is most accurate (quality be damned). AIRcorn (talk) 09:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both versions are provided with the sources given, one of the sources gives version 1 and anther gives version 2 115.187.78.250 (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The current one is the more official variant. See the party card.. -- Director (talk) 02:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

how is that? your version is olny in in one of the versions, version 2 in party card (see http://www.od43.com/NS_Blockleiter_File_3.jpg)is one of the sources you provided 27.96.33.235 (talk) 11:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't quite get what you mean, but here's a link [3]. -- Director (talk) 23:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considering there appears to be much variation in the Parteiadler, I believe there is room for both. File:Parteiadler der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (1933–1945) (andere).svg is supported by various sources and relics. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer top Better aesthetics, and the proportions fit the template better. ^walk victor falk^talk 05:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
-== RfC: which Parteiadler? ==
+== which Parteiadler? ==
-{{rfc|hist|pol|rfcid=DFF58F3}}
 which Parteiadler should we use? [[Special:Contributions/115.187.78.250|115.187.78.250]] ([[User talk:115.187.78.250|talk]]) 15:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)