Talk:Imperial British Conservative Party: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:36, 21 May 2014

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New Zealand: Politics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Australia Stub‑class

	Australia portal Imperial British Conservative Party is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Template:WikiProject Political parties

Question

"dedicated to the grand traditions of British Imperialism in the face of capitalism, globalisation and the distinct lack of culture in Christchurch, New Zealand."

Is this a quote, or the author's own opinion? If a quote, it should be indicated as such. If not, it should be removed for being non-NPOV. Even if it's a silly party, the writeup should be factual. --Spudtater 01:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

What are the notability criteria for such parties? The IBCP certainly ran candidates in every election for over a decade. It got the same newspaper notice as any such party gets. During every election campaign there would be several mentions of it in each of the newspapers. What more could one want? Of course those newspaper archives are not easily accessible now, so I can't cite specific articles, but they were there all right. So how are they less notable than any other joke party? -- 64.131.244.143 (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Is this a quote, or the author's own opinion? If a quote, it should be indicated as such. If not, it should be removed for being non-NPOV. Even if it's a silly party, the writeup should be factual. --[[User:Spudtater|Spudtater]] 01:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
+== Notability ==
+What are the notability criteria for such parties? The IBCP certainly ran candidates in every election for over a decade. It got the same newspaper notice as any such party gets. During every election campaign there would be several mentions of it in each of the newspapers. What more could one want? Of course those newspaper archives are not easily accessible now, so I can't cite specific articles, but they were there all right. So how are they less notable than any other joke party?  -- [[Special:Contributions/64.131.244.143|64.131.244.143]] ([[User talk:64.131.244.143|talk]]) 23:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)