Jump to content

Talk:Josh Tickell: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Controversy: new section
Poujeaux (talk | contribs)
Line 24: Line 24:


Regarding the O'Keefe entrapment controversy, framing on the page needs to handled appropriately, using reliable, unbiased sources. [[WP:BLP]] standards are higher than that of typical WP pages.--[[User:E8|E8]] ([[User talk:E8|talk]]) 00:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Regarding the O'Keefe entrapment controversy, framing on the page needs to handled appropriately, using reliable, unbiased sources. [[WP:BLP]] standards are higher than that of typical WP pages.--[[User:E8|E8]] ([[User talk:E8|talk]]) 00:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
:: So are you suggesting that the film showing Tickell accepting oil money for his anti-fracking film was all faked by Breitbart? [[User:Poujeaux|Poujeaux]] ([[User talk:Poujeaux|talk]]) 16:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:10, 22 May 2014

WikiProject iconBiography C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconEnergy Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Speed Deletion

I think this is an article worth keeping. The person is significant enough. Since no rational was included, I am going to remove the tag. If the person that added the tag adds it again, please include a rational behind your actions, then I would be happy to talk.--Trumpetband 01:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Joshua Tickell

These two articles discuss the same person. They should be merged. Neelix (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is clear-cut, and there was no objection. I merged them. tedder (talk) 03:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I added a notability tag. Notability hasn't been established per Wikipedia:Notability_(people). tedder (talk) 03:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations required

This page in written like a promotion, not objective coverage, and it lacks citations - neither are permissible. Considering the topic (notability is not in doubt), there should be significant, reliable coverage for major portions of the content; other parts are pure puffery and need to be rewritten/removed. I will be citing what I can (help appreciated) and removing the remainder (per WP:BLPSOURCES).--E8 (talk) 18:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

Regarding the O'Keefe entrapment controversy, framing on the page needs to handled appropriately, using reliable, unbiased sources. WP:BLP standards are higher than that of typical WP pages.--E8 (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So are you suggesting that the film showing Tickell accepting oil money for his anti-fracking film was all faked by Breitbart? Poujeaux (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]