Jump to content

Talk:Publication history of DC Comics crossover events: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
forgot to sign
Line 8: Line 8:
==Fan Made or not Fan Made==
==Fan Made or not Fan Made==


I noticed at the bottom three titles I had never heard of before "Crisis on Future Earths", "DC: the reutrn of the Universe", and another, all added on May 26 upon looking it up I found NOTHING, to validate these un-cited crossovers, in fact my preliminary google search only found this page again. I am wondering on the legitamacy of this edit. (On a related note I have attempted to attain the information from comic forums, and a minute later "FAN MADE" appeared next to these titles, which was then removed by a fellow wikier) I would like to attempt to find out if the original piece is graffitti or not, I figure if I don't find the answer in seven days, I will just remove the graffitti that holds no citation. -[[User:Bierschneeman|Bierschneeman]] 29 May 2014
I noticed at the bottom three titles I had never heard of before "Crisis on Future Earths", "DC: the reutrn of the Universe", and another, all added on May 26 upon looking it up I found NOTHING, to validate these un-cited crossovers, in fact my preliminary google search only found this page again. I am wondering on the legitamacy of this edit. (On a related note I have attempted to attain the information from comic forums, and a minute later "FAN MADE" appeared next to these titles, which was then removed by a fellow wikier) I would like to attempt to find out if the original piece is graffitti or not, I figure if I don't find the answer in seven days, I will just remove the graffitti that holds no citation. -[[User:Dwarvenbierschneeman|Dwarvenbierschneeman]] 29 May 2014


== Eligibility ==
== Eligibility ==

Revision as of 07:00, 29 May 2014

WikiProject iconComics: DC Comics List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fan Made or not Fan Made

I noticed at the bottom three titles I had never heard of before "Crisis on Future Earths", "DC: the reutrn of the Universe", and another, all added on May 26 upon looking it up I found NOTHING, to validate these un-cited crossovers, in fact my preliminary google search only found this page again. I am wondering on the legitamacy of this edit. (On a related note I have attempted to attain the information from comic forums, and a minute later "FAN MADE" appeared next to these titles, which was then removed by a fellow wikier) I would like to attempt to find out if the original piece is graffitti or not, I figure if I don't find the answer in seven days, I will just remove the graffitti that holds no citation. -Dwarvenbierschneeman 29 May 2014

Eligibility

Towards the bottom, this article seems to have turned into just a list of crossovers. I don't think this is a good way to go, I think scope should be restricted to major, universe-wide events really. -- SamSim 14:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I total agree but can see this could be difficult to get concensus on what should be included. Here's what I think on some that may be debateable
  1. Prelude to Infinite Crisis should be removed as this is part of and detailed int he article on Infinite Crisis and links to storylines are included there.
  2. DC vs. Marvel and JLA/Avengers should be removed. They are non cannon and had no ongoing impact on DC continuity.
  3. Great Darkness Saga should be removed. While it is a classic story it is a LOSH story with no major crossovers or major effects on other DC books. Leaving it in will just lead to fans of every title wanting their favourite story in. Where is Judas contract, Emerald Dawn, the Return of Barry Allen etc.
  4. Death of Superman/Reign of the Supermen, KnightSaga, and No Man's Land these are the three I am not so sure about. Each is primarily a Superman or Batman title, but they were major story lines beyond the length of anything else done in the DC universe running for dozens of issues with many link in's from other DC Universe titles.
  5. Panic in the Sky should stay. While it occured almost exclusively in Superman titles, it focused on a large number of DC Heroes teaming up to face a global threat.
Others, let me know what you think. -Waza 00:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


We're precisely currently discussing which "events" should be listed in these type of comics Lists and Timelines. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Notice Board. You're welcome to participate. - Wilfredo Martinez 01:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wether there needs be an "events" article or not as well, I think re-reading this article now that "Major storylines of the DC Universe" may be a more appropriate and easier to define article title - Waza 05:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My votes from Events that should be removed are:

Great Darkness Saga- it takes place in the distant future, not the "Modern Era"
Worlds Collide- not likely to be canon due to copyright issues, had no major effects anyway
Marvel vs DC- apparently superceded by JLA vs Avengers
Millenium Giants- other than Superman recovering his normal powers, had no lasting effects
Countdown to Infinite Crisis- should be combined with the Infinite Crisis entry

No sure about:

Trinity (not familiar with it enough to tell its impact)
JLA/Avengers- while not likely to be official due to copyright reasons, a Justice League storyline made references to it, and so has the most recent 2006 Marvel Universe Handbook

-Wilfredo Martinez 17:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about Sinestro Corps War? It seems to be having a major impact on the DCU considering it involves beings like the Antimonitor and Superman Prime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.116.32.136 (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

52

How come 52 isn't on here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike (talkcontribs) 15:14, 4 January 2007

It is now. :) --GentlemanGhost 21:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Trinity (2008)

The entry for Trinity should be removed at least for the time being because although it will likely contain a major event, as of yet it has neither done so nor shown signs of said event.--Darknus823 (talk) 03:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion criteria

I would like to suggest that we do not include events in this article until they actually get released. Any thoughts?--Rockfang (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At least put them under a heading of unreleased Ziaix | (Talk) 22:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Justification?

Stumbled upon this page and honestly my first thought was to just nominate it for deletion per WP:SYN and general listcruft, but thought I'd ask editors who've worked on this first: What is the justification for this page's existence? It seems to (less efficiently) duplicate some of the navigation ability of the DC Comics Crossover infobox at the bottom of the page, with a few subjected "event" storylines (e.g. The Great Darkness Saga) thrown in. As is, this strikes me as a list of "multi-issue DC stories I like" with the official crossovers thrown in to make it look somewhat, well, official.

And yes, I'm aware my characterization here is negative, but I hope editors will realize my intention is to ask a real question: Why does this page exist based on Wikipedia's guidelines? -Markeer 22:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Timeline of the DC Universe"

what happened to that article? and why does this one only cover the Modern Age? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.101.160.159 (talk) 03:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]