Jump to content

User talk:Tristessa de St Ange: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Line 43: Line 43:
==RfM Schiller Institute==
==RfM Schiller Institute==
Hi TDSA, has there been any progress on the RfM? Looking at the case talk page, I see a great summary you added a couple of weeks ago, but nothing much since. It is a tough subject, I know. By all means email me if you want to discuss. [[User:Sunray|Sunray]] ([[User talk:Sunray|talk]]) 01:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi TDSA, has there been any progress on the RfM? Looking at the case talk page, I see a great summary you added a couple of weeks ago, but nothing much since. It is a tough subject, I know. By all means email me if you want to discuss. [[User:Sunray|Sunray]] ([[User talk:Sunray|talk]]) 01:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

:I hope you're not too discouraged by the opening salvos being fired. I would not discount the possibility that some people start with extreme belligerence as a negotiating tactic, a position from which they may retreat somewhat in order to be seen as compromising. [[User:Joe Bodacious|Joe Bodacious]] ([[User talk:Joe Bodacious|talk]]) 06:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


==RfM Pure Heroine==
==RfM Pure Heroine==

Revision as of 06:40, 20 July 2014

Pure Heroin mediation

Welcome back, Tristessa. Just thought I'd note a couple of observations about that mediation:

  • The filing editor hasn't edited WP since April 1 (at least not signed-in; there are a couple of IP edits on other articles which might be him), has only 34 total edits, and no email account registered. You might have to move forward without him, but there's at least one other active editor who took the same position, so that may be possible.
  • The discussion has moved on substantially at the article talk page with a number of additional editors joining in who weren't participating when the request was filed. There's not been any discussion, but a bit of editing in mainspace, on this point over a month, so there may not be a real or active dispute still pending. If there is a dispute, you might need to add some additional parties and get their consents.

Just thought you might like to know. Though I'm also a member of MedCom, I've not taken it because of potential bias on my part: I hate disputes about music genres and don't feel that I can bring anything to them. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicki Minaj videography

Hi, I am currently in the nomination process of getting Nicki Minaj videography up to featured list status. I was wondering whether you could take a look and possibly leave your thoughts/opposition/support for the nomination and leave any suggestions you may have to improve it. Thank you :) Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicki Minaj videography/archive1 KaneZolanski (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Albert Einstein

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Albert Einstein. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Draft talk:Half-Life 3

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Draft talk:Half-Life 3. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Amen

Daniel Amen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Your attention is called to a Request for comment at Talk:Daniel_Amen#RFC: List of journal articles. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfM Schiller Institute

Hi TDSA, has there been any progress on the RfM? Looking at the case talk page, I see a great summary you added a couple of weeks ago, but nothing much since. It is a tough subject, I know. By all means email me if you want to discuss. Sunray (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're not too discouraged by the opening salvos being fired. I would not discount the possibility that some people start with extreme belligerence as a negotiating tactic, a position from which they may retreat somewhat in order to be seen as compromising. Joe Bodacious (talk) 06:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfM Pure Heroine

On this one, I'm not seeing a response to your proposal from the participants. Is it worth contacting them again? I can do that if you want. It may have gone stale, but that's your call. Let me know if you want me to either contact them, or close the case. Sunray (talk) 01:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Free! (anime)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Free! (anime). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]