Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honor Oak Christian Fellowship Centre: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''' All that I can find are self-published books.--[[Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231]] ([[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 02:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' All that I can find are self-published books.--[[Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231]] ([[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 02:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' -- I think that historically this has been a significant church in its time. My recollection is that [[Ichthus Fellowiship]] grew out of Honor Oak, but I may be wrong. I note that the site is now in use by others, so that this is a historical article. I appreciate that the sources are not the best ones, but do we have reason to believe that they are inaccurate? [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 11:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' -- I think that historically this has been a significant church in its time. My recollection is that [[Ichthus Fellowiship]] grew out of Honor Oak, but I may be wrong. I note that the site is now in use by others, so that this is a historical article. I appreciate that the sources are not the best ones, but do we have reason to believe that they are inaccurate? [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 11:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
**'''Comment'''{{ping|Peterkingiron}} The article contains only one source, and I can't verify it. Hardly will this source [[WP:GNG|be considered '''neutral''', '''credible''' and '''sufficiently detailed''' for a comprehensive article]]. --[[Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231]] ([[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
**'''Comment''' {{ping|Peterkingiron}} The article contains only one source, and I can't verify it. Hardly will this source [[WP:GNG|be considered '''neutral''', '''credible''' and '''sufficiently detailed''' for a comprehensive article]]. --[[Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231]] ([[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 12:41, 1 September 2014
- Honor Oak Christian Fellowship Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP: MILL church Mr. Guye (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete All that I can find are self-published books.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 02:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep -- I think that historically this has been a significant church in its time. My recollection is that Ichthus Fellowiship grew out of Honor Oak, but I may be wrong. I note that the site is now in use by others, so that this is a historical article. I appreciate that the sources are not the best ones, but do we have reason to believe that they are inaccurate? Peterkingiron (talk) 11:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment @Peterkingiron: The article contains only one source, and I can't verify it. Hardly will this source be considered neutral, credible and sufficiently detailed for a comprehensive article. --180.172.239.231 (talk) 12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)