Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longnan Railway Station

Longnan Railway Station

Longnan Railway Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unresolved notability since 2008. Unverified since early 2013. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Keep - Easy to verify [1][2] (gmaps seem to have their text-satellite alignment a little off). The WP community wisely decided a long time ago that all rail stations are considered notable (see WP:OUTCOMES) as it prevents the it from having to tirelessly scrutinize the viability of the tens of thousands of rail station articles when editors time is much better spent improving existing articles or creating new ones as well as improving an amicable working relationship with each other.--Oakshade (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• I don't see anything about stations in WP:OUTCOMES, all WP:RAILOUTCOMES says is that "subway and railway lines often survive AfD" 109.76.249.184 (talk) 10:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. It has long been considered on Wikipedia that all railway stations are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:RAILOUTCOMES or WP:RAILSTATION, although such articles on Chinese wiki rarely survive AfD.-180.172.239.231 (talk) 10:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)