Talk:Potassium in biology: Difference between revisions
m Article Class assessment using AWB |
→normal diet inadequate: new section |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:Please don't use the {{tl|npov}} tag if you have concerns about an article's breadth of coverage. The article may be incomplete, but there isn't actually an issue of 'bias' here, is there? (That is, the content which is present doesn't misrepresent scientific consensus on the issues, does it?) I have removed the tag, though please – by all means – expand the article to cover other aspects of potassium in biology. Part of the problem may be the "Function in the body" section, which actually contains the beginnings of some useful molecular biology and should probably be retitled and expanded. (Either that, or this article should become [[Potassium in health]] or somesuch — the vast bulk of links to this article are from health, rather than biology, topics.) I note that this article is also poorly integrated with [[Potassium#Biological role]]. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 23:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC) |
:Please don't use the {{tl|npov}} tag if you have concerns about an article's breadth of coverage. The article may be incomplete, but there isn't actually an issue of 'bias' here, is there? (That is, the content which is present doesn't misrepresent scientific consensus on the issues, does it?) I have removed the tag, though please – by all means – expand the article to cover other aspects of potassium in biology. Part of the problem may be the "Function in the body" section, which actually contains the beginnings of some useful molecular biology and should probably be retitled and expanded. (Either that, or this article should become [[Potassium in health]] or somesuch — the vast bulk of links to this article are from health, rather than biology, topics.) I note that this article is also poorly integrated with [[Potassium#Biological role]]. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 23:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
== normal diet inadequate == |
|||
"Healthy individuals who eat a balanced diet rarely need supplements." This reassurance conflicts with recent science; most people ingest about half the recommended amount of potassium. Supplements are not generally a good solution, but seeking foods higher in potassium may be healthier for most people. -[[Special:Contributions/96.233.22.219|96.233.22.219]] ([[User talk:96.233.22.219|talk]]) 22:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:16, 10 September 2014
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Neuroscience Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Recommend merge with Potassium. - Hemanshu 03:29, 29 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Dear Hemanshu, I strongly resist. I didn't expand this article yet, because I can't find enough power for it. But the role of some ions in biology is extremely peculiar, so you can write a little article about them. And, from the other side, these articles (like K in biology, Na in biology etc.) will be certainly written in a different clue in comparison with the 'physical' and 'chemical' articles. Which are now prevalent.
Of course it's your will to make this or that decision and I will not change anything 'back'. But I really think it will be better to separate these two articles. The calbidin and calmodulin-dependend processes are waiting for their description on this page, as well as the internal Ca depos phenomena etc. Think about it. Arseni 8:29, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- I think the articles should not be merged. When you link people from neurobiology or other biology articles, they want to know about the role of potassium in the cell, not about the metal. It will be harder to find that info embedded in a more general page. Plus, there's so much to say about the role of potassium in biology that it's astonishing that there isn't already a huge article on it. I can begin adding to this article soon.--Delldot 06:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Nay on merger. I copied the content over from the Potassium article to this article. Mathiastck 20:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Opposed to merger. The role of potassium in biology should be separate as it is an entirely separate issue. In fact, the section in the Potassium article is over sized, and should be cropped to a more abbreviated form, with the excess merged into this article. --Gregory JH (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
To expand this page
These links might help: Foods high in Potassium http://www.weightlossforall.com/potassium-rich-food.htm Potassium and Your CKD Diet What is potassium and why is it important to you? http://www.kidney.org/atoz/atozItem.cfm?id=103 Mathiastck 20:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
this article is biased against plants
I have tagged the article accordingly. John Riemann Soong (talk) 04:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Please don't use the {{npov}} tag if you have concerns about an article's breadth of coverage. The article may be incomplete, but there isn't actually an issue of 'bias' here, is there? (That is, the content which is present doesn't misrepresent scientific consensus on the issues, does it?) I have removed the tag, though please – by all means – expand the article to cover other aspects of potassium in biology. Part of the problem may be the "Function in the body" section, which actually contains the beginnings of some useful molecular biology and should probably be retitled and expanded. (Either that, or this article should become Potassium in health or somesuch — the vast bulk of links to this article are from health, rather than biology, topics.) I note that this article is also poorly integrated with Potassium#Biological role. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
normal diet inadequate
"Healthy individuals who eat a balanced diet rarely need supplements." This reassurance conflicts with recent science; most people ingest about half the recommended amount of potassium. Supplements are not generally a good solution, but seeking foods higher in potassium may be healthier for most people. -96.233.22.219 (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)