Talk:Naked Capitalism: Difference between revisions
added wikiproject templates |
→Gongol.com ranking: new section |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:GonzaloLira|GonzaloLira]] ([[User talk:GonzaloLira|talk]]) 00:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC) |
--[[User:GonzaloLira|GonzaloLira]] ([[User talk:GonzaloLira|talk]]) 00:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Gongol.com ranking == |
|||
As of 2014, Gongol.com no long updates its ranking of business and economic websites. |
|||
But when it did, prior to 2012, it was generally acknowledged to be authoritative. |
|||
Hence maintaining the reference. |
|||
—[[User:MILH|MILH]] ([[User talk:MILH|talk]]) 01:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:48, 30 September 2014
![]() | Blogging Unassessed (inactive) | ||||||
|
![]() | Economics Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Hang on
My gut reaction to seeing this was to label it with A7 too, but a cursory Google search reveals that it's fairly well known, even mentioned in a few Huffington Post articles. I think an AFD would be more appropriate to fully explore the extent of this article's significance. AP1787 (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Removed speedy deletion
I removed the speedy delietion tag—Naked Capitalism is the fifth most visited finance blog: If that doesn't make it noteworthy, I don't know what does. To top it off, Yves Smith's just-published book, Econned is currently #30 on Amazon's list of economic books. [1]
--GonzaloLira (talk) 00:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Gongol.com ranking
As of 2014, Gongol.com no long updates its ranking of business and economic websites.
But when it did, prior to 2012, it was generally acknowledged to be authoritative.
Hence maintaining the reference.