Jump to content

User talk:Serialjoepsycho: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 109.156.95.73 (talk). (TW)
→‎IPT: new section
Line 29: Line 29:
: You are correct, self-published sources can be used for non-controversial non-promotional when no other sources can be found. In this case I think it has been abused. I know of a board to improve translated articles, but it is geared towards improving readability. I don´t know of any noticeboard to help verify references in foreign languages. If you find it, please let me know, I would be happy to give a hand with Spanish.--[[User:Crystallizedcarbon|Crystallizedcarbon]] ([[User talk:Crystallizedcarbon|talk]]) 20:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
: You are correct, self-published sources can be used for non-controversial non-promotional when no other sources can be found. In this case I think it has been abused. I know of a board to improve translated articles, but it is geared towards improving readability. I don´t know of any noticeboard to help verify references in foreign languages. If you find it, please let me know, I would be happy to give a hand with Spanish.--[[User:Crystallizedcarbon|Crystallizedcarbon]] ([[User talk:Crystallizedcarbon|talk]]) 20:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
:: Good idea!--[[User:Crystallizedcarbon|Crystallizedcarbon]] ([[User talk:Crystallizedcarbon|talk]]) 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
:: Good idea!--[[User:Crystallizedcarbon|Crystallizedcarbon]] ([[User talk:Crystallizedcarbon|talk]]) 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

== IPT ==

[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to use talk pages for [[WP:TALK|inappropriate discussion]], as you did at [[:Investigative Project on Terrorism]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-chat3 -->

Revision as of 04:43, 17 October 2014

Please comment on Talk:Ed Miliband

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ed Miliband. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Labour Party (UK)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Labour Party (UK). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 military intervention against ISIS. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alex Jones (radio host). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Joni Ernst

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joni Ernst. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have a feeling that Chef martin joel vasquez is not going to be back to tell us his concerns about Hector_Jimenez-Bravo ;)
In any case, I think the article does read like a promotional piece, too many of the sources are pointing to his own website, and too many details are included in the article that should not be there. Can you take care of the pruning? If not, let me know and I will try to find some time. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about this approach to at least bring it a bit closer to guidelines?
  1. Eliminate most of the 8 references that point to the BLP's own website (not necessarily the content).
  2. Eliminate excessive details (that could be deemed promotional regardless of weather they are properly sourced) in the text.

Other editors with knowledge of Russian may fine tune it in the future.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, self-published sources can be used for non-controversial non-promotional when no other sources can be found. In this case I think it has been abused. I know of a board to improve translated articles, but it is geared towards improving readability. I don´t know of any noticeboard to help verify references in foreign languages. If you find it, please let me know, I would be happy to give a hand with Spanish.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea!--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IPT

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Investigative Project on Terrorism, you may be blocked from editing.