User talk:The Four Deuces

RfC/U

Dear TFD, as you know in the past I experienced some difficulties dealing with User:Director. For this reason I have filed a RfC/U to discuss about Director's conduct, because I genuinely believe he dealt with me with improper language (inaccaptable, regardeless of the difficulties of communication we experienced). I did not file an AN/I because I am not looking for a sanction but rather I would like to have a large discussion about this issue. And who knows may be I am the guilty one.

I need two or more users certifying the basis for the dispute (they can be "Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute" or "Additional users endorsing this cause for concern"). It is a very bureaucratic process but it's like that. Please note that if by the 4th of July 8:30am two users have not certyfied the basis for the dispute, the entire RfC/U is archived and I will have to edit an AN/I which I would like to avoid.

I requested to an experience user. Finding people to certify/endorse an RfC/u is not canvassing.

You can access to the RfC/U form at [[1]] and fill the section "Users certifying the basis for this dispute". Silvio1973 (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Swedish nationalism and fascism

Hi TFD, considering your experience with these kind of topic I'd like to ask for your opinion on this template and its talkpage. My view is that if someone creates a template about nationalism and fascism, the burden of proof is there to show literature which describes Swedish nationalism and fascism as the same phenomenon, because mainstream sources do not generally view fascism and nationalism as the same ideology. Furthermore, linking Jimmie Åkesson with a fascism template for example is a BLP violation unless there is a solid source for that. I was wondering whether "Far-right in Sweden" would be a better title for that, avoiding the fascism+nationalism synthesis.

I've often had different views in some talk page discussion than you, which actually is the precise reason I'm asking for your opinion before filing a third opinion or dispute resolution form. --Pudeo' 23:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I provided my comments. TFD (talk) 23:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library - ScotlandsPeople - You've got mail

Hello, The Four Deuces. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.—  Philg88 ^♦talk 11:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

mediation

please stop rehashing issues in the mediation. please let the mediator guide the discussion and just respond simply and directly to questions the mediator asks. thank you. Jytdog (talk) 06:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC) (struck, apologies for the offense Jytdog (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC))

Moved your comment to comment section on Talk:Marxism-Leninism

I have moved your comment here as I requested that users do at the beginning of the post on the list. If you want to move it back that's okay, but I am going to be adding more sources there and it will be very confusing if comments are all over the place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.209.197 (talk) 04:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

I have responded to your question on my talk page.--50.101.209.197 (talk) 06:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Have left another response to yours on my talk page.--50.101.209.197 (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)