User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2012/April
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiThanks
![WikiThanks](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/WikiThanks.png/43px-WikiThanks.png)
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.142 (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution on Fascism article opened
I have opened up a dispute resolution request over the issue of fascism's claim to be democratic that is on the Talk:Fascism page. Here is the dispute resolution request at the noticeboard: [1]--R-41 (talk) 02:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
![]() Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello The Four Deuces/Archives/2012. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Notice of Wikiquette Assistance discussion
Hello, The Four Deuces. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collect (talk • contribs) 12:21, 14 April 2012
Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
- Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
- If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 21:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Nazism
Re your last post, I suggest you to modify it asap. We don't need new ANI or AE threads as a result of complaints which may follow.--Paul Siebert (talk) 03:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Collect posted:
- (1) "All of which is somewhat in countervention to your assertion. Cheers. Collect (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)"
- (2) "My first comments were about TFD's poorly chosen "claims".... the Catholic basis for anti-Semitism seems quite important, contrary to TFD's assertions. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)"
- In fact I made no assertions or claims - read my sole contribution to the discussion thread here. Could you ask Collect to withdraw his false accusation.
- TFD (talk) 05:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
AGREE AGF tdf. Darkstar1st (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
My name
Either learn to use copy-paste or stop the attempts to use my name. As I've commented on your mangling of my name at least twice (if not thrice) before, it shouldn't be all that hard to understand. --Sander Säde 06:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- I do not remember your complaining before. It is standard to write "ä" as "ae" using an English keyboard,[2] and I did not think it would object. TFD (talk) 14:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
You wanted additional references for support, I gave them - stop accusing me of promoting original research
They are NOT my original theories they are from sources - read Stanley Payne in A History of Fascism, Cyprian Blamires in World Fascism: A Historical Encyclopedia, and others I mentioned - they all describe the RSS' connection with fascism. Stop your false accusation that they are my "original theories" - you wanted references that support the claims of its association with fascism, I have given you multiple references - perhaps if you took the time to even bother to read them before falsely accusing me of promoting "original theories" - assuming bad faith on my part, you would have come to another conclusion.--R-41 (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC)